Back from vacation, I read with pleasure the missed posts and your exchanges
Thank you for all you do, James APT.. to make the project even better
Let me know if you need my help, or when, to update the base package.
Not to many Project Updates - or a least nothing critical yet..
Most are MoPlugins with PEB compatibility fixes....
I noticed your [FullSoftwareNetworkDefault] process in last release & removed my implication of it from Explorer for next
Hi KYHI,
I've been too far away from PE lately, I don't get what you mean about the [FullSoftwareNetworkDefault]
Hi ChrisR, nice to see you back here.
Have you tried any recent versions of Ventoy?
What do you think of LongPanda's (Ventoy developer) suggestion for some sort of "Ventoy-compatible" support built-in to XPE?
For me, recent versions of Ventoy boot XPE just fine, but I believe there are others who have less perfect results with booting the XPE iso from Ventoy.
No rush, but maybe you would like to check it out sometime, Ventoy seems to get more and more popular.
Almost forgot to include this link where he discusses this issue.
Hi atari800xl,
No, I haven't tested Ventoy yet, although it looks very interesting.
As soon as I have some free time, I'll try it on, and I'll get back to you.
However, for my use, I'm not really fan to have to disable the secure boot in Bios UEFI
About Secure Boot in UEFI mode from https://www.ventoy.net/en/doc_secure.html
Secure Boot was supported from Ventoy 1.0.07, but the solution is not perfect enough.
So from ventoy 1.0.09, an option for secure boot is added in Ventoy2Disk.exe/Ventoy2Disk.sh and default is disabled.
So by default, you need to disabled secure boot in BIOS before boot Ventoy in UEFI mode.
If you want you can turn it on...
yes and registry in Explorer.... As I was not aware of your Build Core Process or that you had added the NetworkAdditions-FullSoftware Fix there - so we got crossed in the last release... (No Big Deal)Is it in Explorer_AddFiles.txt to remove the same dependencies (wcmapi.dll, wcmcsp.dll, wcmsvc.dll, mobilenetworking.dll) ?
Also I see no reason the implement Ventoy into project - as is already provided as a stand alone user option
To avoid confusion: I wasn't suggesting "implementing Ventoy" in any manner, but only wanted to share that link where LongPanda (Ventoy dev) was discussing a way to make sure drive "Y:" is re-mounted after booting the Win10XPE iso. I know ChrisR was interested in this matter, so I wanted to point him to the discussion about the "Ventoy compatible" issue.
I agree with ChrisR that disabling Secure Boot is a security issue, in general Ventoy needs to assure its users that the program is safe. I know the full source code is available, but (like XPE) users must be able to trust these tools 100%.
