Time Spy - DirectX 12 benchmark test


  1. Posts : 27,183
    Win11 Pro, Win10 Pro N, Win10 Home, Windows 8.1 Pro, Ubuntu
       #1461

    CPU:
    @5.372GHz
    GPU:
    Memory 11,264 MB
    Core clock 2,145 MHz

    Cold morning, balcony door and bedroom window open(cross breeze)

    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti video card benchmark result - Intel Core i9-9900K Processor,ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG MAXIMUS X HERO
    Time Spy - DirectX 12 benchmark test-image.jpg
      My Computers


  2. Posts : 134,318
    Windows 11 Pro (x64) 23H2 Build 22631.3296
       #1462
      My Computers


  3. Posts : 27,183
    Win11 Pro, Win10 Pro N, Win10 Home, Windows 8.1 Pro, Ubuntu
       #1463

    Interesting data Mike

    My Score: 15350

    GPU:
    Memory 11,264 MB
    Core clock 2,145 MHz
    Memory bus clock 2,050 MHz

    CPU
    Maximum turbo core clock 5,378 MHz


    Your Score: 15357

    GPU
    Memory 11,264 MB
    Core clock 2,115 MHz
    Memory bus clock 2,014 MHz

    CPU
    Maximum turbo core clock 5,116 MHz


    Even though I am higher overclocked, your score is still higher(only 7 points, but nevertheless higher)
      My Computers


  4. Posts : 27,183
    Win11 Pro, Win10 Pro N, Win10 Home, Windows 8.1 Pro, Ubuntu
       #1464

    By the way, my CPU never went above 34°C, and my GPU never above 41°C
      My Computers


  5. Posts : 134,318
    Windows 11 Pro (x64) 23H2 Build 22631.3296
       #1465

    Cliff S said:
    Interesting data Mike

    My Score: 15350

    GPU:
    Memory 11,264 MB
    Core clock 2,145 MHz
    Memory bus clock 2,050 MHz

    CPU
    Maximum turbo core clock 5,378 MHz


    Your Score: 15357

    GPU
    Memory 11,264 MB
    Core clock 2,115 MHz
    Memory bus clock 2,014 MHz

    CPU
    Maximum turbo core clock 5,116 MHz


    Even though I am higher overclocked, your score is still higher(only 7 points, but nevertheless higher)
    Well lots of folks always say our CPU is only a small % of the score, not completely sure this is true. But I am hoping it is, cause I can't oc my 9900k as high as you can.....and it IS the luck of the draw on these 9900k's .....not my MB. Some can just OC higher than others. Plain and simple. Dam it.... You Won the CPU lottery this time, and I lost.
      My Computers


  6. Posts : 27,183
    Win11 Pro, Win10 Pro N, Win10 Home, Windows 8.1 Pro, Ubuntu
       #1466

    OldMike65 said:
    Well lots of folks always say our CPU is only a small % of the score, not completely sure this is true. But I am hoping it is, cause I can't oc my 9900k as high as you can.....and it IS the luck of the draw on these 9900k's .....not my MB. Some can just OC higher than others. Plain and simple. Dam it.... You Won the CPU lottery this time, and I lost.
    Look at the GPU overclocks too
    The thing is, there is a point in benchmarking, where raising the all the clocks; brings diminishing returns, and at that point, it's about balancing out where your OCs peaked at individually.
    For example, if your score drops when you raise the GPU core clock, go back, and fiddle with the mem clock, or play with the core voltage(might need to drop some), see if raising or lowering motherboard base clock helps(on most boards it changes the PCIe speed also) and so on.

    I'm just too impatient to go through all that(balancing the system) in one go or day even
      My Computers


  7. Posts : 134,318
    Windows 11 Pro (x64) 23H2 Build 22631.3296
       #1467

    Cliff S said:
    Look at the GPU overclocks too
    The thing is, there is a point in benchmarking, where raising the all the clocks; brings diminishing returns, and at that point, it's about balancing out where your OCs peaked at individually.
    For example, if your score drops when you raise the GPU core clock, go back, and fiddle with the mem clock, or play with the core voltage(might need to drop some), see if raising or lowering motherboard base clock helps(on most boards it changes the PCIe speed also) and so on.

    I'm just too impatient to go through all that(balancing the system) in one go or day even
    Yes on all the above Cliff, been doing it that way for a long time.....and yes, you got to have lots of patience to say the least.

    Unless your like Dave and have lots of tricks you can use ....
      My Computers


  8. Posts : 27,183
    Win11 Pro, Win10 Pro N, Win10 Home, Windows 8.1 Pro, Ubuntu
       #1468

    I did some looking at the leader boards, and on a couple, there are way lower clocked 8700Ks paired with lower clocked 1080Ti's putting my system to shame
      My Computers


  9. Posts : 134,318
    Windows 11 Pro (x64) 23H2 Build 22631.3296
       #1469

    Cliff S said:
    I did some looking at the leader boards, and on a couple, there are way lower clocked 8700Ks paired with lower clocked 1080Ti's putting my system to shame
    There seems to be lots of tricks to getting these high scores Cliff.....and we don't know any of them .....
      My Computers


  10. Posts : 27,183
    Win11 Pro, Win10 Pro N, Win10 Home, Windows 8.1 Pro, Ubuntu
       #1470

    OldMike65 said:
    There seems to be lots of tricks to getting these high scores Cliff.....and we don't know any of them .....
    Oh well.
    I use benchmarks(when I run them months later) to really check my system, if the thermal poop is still doing it's job, have I dropped clocks(silicone degradation, then I need to lower the OC & voltage so the ceases), maybe a BIOS update was it, or the lateset spectre/meltdown fix, and so on.
    Plus it's just plain fun
      My Computers


 

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 10 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 10" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 23:40.
Find Us




Windows 10 Forums