fbl impressive code 10049 windows update

Wynona said:

You make some pretty bad accusations, but that's OK. I will continue to test Windows 10 to the best of my ability.

What's ironic is that I've now been accused of being both too serious about the TP and now you say I have a mixture of boredom and curiosity. Hmmm, maybe that's what it takes to check Windows 10 Technical Preview all the way.

Oh, well, I'll continue on with my testing . . .

Do note the word PERHAPS before "Boredom and Curiosity" and the word MAY after.
These words were not meant to set in concrete an opinion, in other words no offence was meant.

Wynona said:

Huh!?! Nope, I haven't missed any points at all! Microsoft wants feedback. Last time I checked, it wasn't limited to such a narrow margin that we don't get to check everything possible out.

I am not bored; far from it. Curiosity kilt da ferret? Nah, I don't think so.

You make some pretty bad accusations, but that's OK. I will continue to test Windows 10 to the best of my ability.

What's ironic is that I've now been accused of being both too serious about the TP and now you say I have a mixture of boredom and curiosity. Hmmm, maybe that's what it takes to check Windows 10 Technical Preview all the way.

Oh, well, I'll continue on with my testing . . .

. . .You go Girl. . .

finally, got 10049 installed. Almost felt like having a wisdom tooth pulled....

Mayagrafix said:

finally, got 10049 installed. Almost felt like having a wisdom tooth pulled....

I love it, love it, love it! I'm sure you created my best laugh of the day, but Microsoft should have one of those for every temperamental installation attempted.

April Fool!

dencal said:

Do note the word PERHAPS before "Boredom and Curiosity" and the word MAY after.
These words were not meant to set in concrete an opinion, in other words no offence was meant.

Of course; I understand legal maneuvering all too well . . . "actionable" vs "non-actionable". I am very careful to be sure I don't offend anyone with my "superior" (NOT no way nohow!) knowledge, nor do I attempt to belittle them. Please read your own statement and tell me what you see. Take out "Perhaps" and "may have" and what do you have left?

What is left is that I am told that I'm using this OS purely for my own benefit and that nothing I do or say has any benefit to Microsoft.

Wynona.
You are missing the point, the title of this O/S is Evaluation.
You are using this O/S purely for your own benefit, toys for the boys or girls come to mind.
Perhaps a mixture of boredom or curiosity may have influenced you, but are of no benefit to M$ in the development of this O/S.

Originally Posted by Wynona Huh!?! Nope, I haven't missed any points at all! Microsoft wants feedback. Last time I checked, it wasn't limited to such a narrow margin that we don't get to check everything possible out.

I am not bored; far from it. Curiosity kilt da ferret? Nah, I don't think so.

You make some pretty bad accusations, but that's OK. I will continue to test Windows 10 to the best of my ability.

What's ironic is that I've now been accused of being both too serious about the TP and now you say I have a mixture of boredom and curiosity. Hmmm, maybe that's what it takes to check Windows 10 Technical Preview all the way.

Oh, well, I'll continue on with my testing . . .

Wynona said:

Of course; I understand legal maneuvering all too well . . . "actionable" vs "non-actionable". I am very careful to be sure I don't offend anyone with my "superior" (NOT no way nohow!) knowledge, nor do I attempt to belittle them. Please read your own statement and tell me what you see. Take out "Perhaps" and "may have" and what do you have left?

What is left is that I am told that I'm using this OS purely for my own benefit and that nothing I do or say has any benefit to Microsoft.



Originally Posted by Wynona Huh!?! Nope, I haven't missed any points at all! Microsoft wants feedback. Last time I checked, it wasn't limited to such a narrow margin that we don't get to check everything possible out.

I am not bored; far from it. Curiosity kilt da ferret? Nah, I don't think so.

You make some pretty bad accusations, but that's OK. I will continue to test Windows 10 to the best of my ability.

What's ironic is that I've now been accused of being both too serious about the TP and now you say I have a mixture of boredom and curiosity. Hmmm, maybe that's what it takes to check Windows 10 Technical Preview all the way.

Oh, well, I'll continue on with my testing . . .

and maybe lay off the Lone Star?

10049 upgrade is painfully slow on an i5 3550 machine with 16GB of RAM. Started the download around 2PM, and started the install process about 2:35; its now 6:42 and its only at 76% (and been there for a while). I don't remember taking this long on previous versions.

Roger said:

and maybe lay off the Lone Star?

Oh, no, no, no, no . . . Sometimes the Lone Star is a very necessary part of testing, dontcha know!?!

fireberd said:

10049 upgrade is painfully slow on an i5 3550 machine with 16GB of RAM. Started the download around 2PM, and started the install process about 2:35; its now 6:42 and its only at 76% (and been there for a while). I don't remember taking this long on previous versions.

Wow, something must be wrong. I have literally half the machine you do, and it didn't take that long, even though I started the download and installation only a few hours after it became available.

BTW, 10049 does seem to be pretty snappy.