New
#110
You have that correct. I mentioned where we should start.
For starters they manipulate what our Constitution states: Commerce Clause - Wikipedia
With enough public dissent we should carry out what Iceland did. Clean house and start all over.
Iceland - Wikipedia
“Oh! The Feds created it. It must be good!”I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.
~ Thomas Jefferson (Attributed)
http://www.jekyllislandhistory.com/federalreserve.shtml
Federal Reserve System - Wikipedia
Criticism of the Federal Reserve - Wikipedia
The Refounding Father: The Federal Reserve Bank: A Greater Threat to America's Security Than Al-Qaeda?
That YOU know of.
Net neutrality in the United States - Wikipedia
Those are just a few major ones. There are more. Then I’m sure that there are some we don’t know of.
I specifically chose Safety Regulations as most people can grasp the concept.
A significant percentage of US citizens can't grasp the concept of Consumer Protection Regulations.
Suppose AT&T, Charter, Comcast and Verizon decide that they don't like MS' multi-GB W10 updates clogging up their networks (chewing up valuable advertising bandwidth) so they cap all MS sites at 1 Mb/s.
That would never happen, Microsoft would not just sit back and take it. The Three main Offenders were AT&T, Comcast and Verizon. A couple more that I never heard of. The sky is not falling and the NET is still running. The Federal Reserve Bank has absolutely nothing to do with this. They are a separate problem.
What could MS do about it?
Not send them W10 updates?
Not honour their SLA contracts?
Just to stick it to MS:
- Apple could supply them with cheap Macs
- Google could supply them with cut-rate Cloud-based services
I agree.
I didn't say anything about the Federal Reserve, why did you bring it up?
Be careful what you say:
- There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. Steve Ballmer, USA Today, April 30, 2007.
- There is no reason for any individual to have a computer in his home. Ken Olson, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC), in a talk given to a 1977 World Future Society meeting in Boston. This is widely quoted but Olsen claims it is taken out of context, that he was not referring to personal computers but to a household computer that would control the home. Reference: "Ken Olsen", Snopes, includes bibliography.
- But the real future of the laptop computer will remain in the specialized niche markets. Because no matter how inexpensive the machines become, and no matter how sophisticated their software, I still can't imagine the average user taking one along when going fishing. Erik Sandberg-Diment, "The Executive Computer", The New York Times (December 8, 1985)
- Television? The word is half Latin and half Greek. No good can come of it. C. P. Scott, BBC History of television.
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Incorrect_predictions
In some strange way, I like how you think...
I was going for California's deregulation and subsequent energy crisis. Think Enron.
When FCC Kills Net Neutrality, Here's What Internet Could Look Like - Page 12 - Windows 10 Forums
You did not but another member did. The Net Neutrality is just another useless regulation that has been done away with. Users can still file a complaint with The FCC about any shenanigans caused by AT&t, Comcast and Version.