New
#250
Not sure I understand you. Personally, I am on the Skip Ahead track (or at least I was when I last checked - I'm in Linux right now). And yet I have no assurance that I would not be assigned to the B category - which would be contradictory by definition. In general somebody being on the B track would hardly seem to be an "Insider". I hope there will be more of a clarification of this when the next build is released. How could the A and B versions be the same build? These are but a few of the questions that are involved. I will need to scroll back the conversation to find the link to an apparent Feedback Hub discussion but I have little reason to think that that is more looked at than this forum by MS employees. It seems dated by a week or more in some cases.
It will be definitely interesting times ahead if Microsoft once again attempts to carve out different classes of Insiders. Remember many of us have been thrown off Skip ahead and had to use the registry hack to return. I can't fathom this decision but then again they are not paying me the big bucks.
Update:
#WindowsInsiders we’ve hit a bug that prevents UWPs from opening so we will not be flighting a new build today. Have a great weekend!Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) View on Twitter
I think Insiders are putting a lot of pressure on the devs and testers -- been there, done that, even wore the panties...in corporate...hey, it's not fun.
Having said that-- they seem to be doing OK... just saying (WAAS is about hustle... LOL)