New
#240
ah no. read through the Hub and twitter and this forum. It used to take 20 minutes. If MS wants to succeed they need to speed up this process. When I tested Vista, they mailed DVD's to us. Now they will not even provide a download of an ISO till weeks after the build is out. Doing that would speed it up. Mount and run and you are done./
For those with bandwidth issues or installation time issues, maybe embedded Linux would be an option. Can be 8MB in size and with some assembly hacking you even get a working GUI that is really responsive. There even exist a full blown 64-bit multitasking OS with a GUI that fits on a Floppy. That one is also quite nice, and extremely fast even on my ancient hardware.
For those less wealthy countries, Windows is not the only OS in this world. For education, any OS will be more than good enough.
I see most here see UUP issues from an insider with multiple computers perspective where we upgrade several computers every week. So what if the upgrade takes a bit longer. It save internet bandwidth and that is what matters to everybody, including those who don't even use Windows at all.
Microsoft has server farms all over the world and you are trying to tell me that Bandwidth will hurt them? The average person will not wait 2 to 6 hours for an upgrade with a DVD would take 20 minutes. But you can believe as you wish. The download the old way was faster as was the installation. My God someone on a dial up would be doing it for a week.