New
#30
Like others, I believe is probably now RTM but the bit I find odd is that we have a full upgrade to go from 16299.0 to 16299.15.
I understand the reasons etc. What I do not understand is why they simply did not number it 16300.0 - the only thing I can think of is that Skippy builds were 163XX and they were trying to stay away from 163XX numbers to avoid any confusion (either that all their internal documentation was predicated/promised around version 16299 and it is too late to change it -LOL)
As far as I know, this is a first - a full in-build upgrade - does this mean even when RTM, MS could do that e.g. if they got an issue that could not be fixed via normal cumulative updates?