New
#50
Took something like 3 hours this time as opposed to the 5 hours for 294. I wonder why the difference.
Took something like 3 hours this time as opposed to the 5 hours for 294. I wonder why the difference.
Kari:
You should really look into this site. uuptoisosetup.exe passes the Edge scan and I personally think it's OK ....
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/f...c814/analysis/
Marty:
You should really try to understand what has been told to you several times in different threads: those are false positives, and I am working on it.
You should also read the tutorial thread and post your concerns there, instead of posting about this same topic everywgere else but the tutorial in question. Here's an extract of my recent post in tutorial:
Kari
[QUOTE=Kari;1149547]Marty:
You should really try to understand what has been told to you several times in different threads: those are false positives, and I am working on it.
You should also read the tutorial thread and post your concerns there, instead of posting about this same topic everywgere else but the tutorial in question. Here's an extract of my recent post in tutorial:
As I said I personally do not feel your program is infected. As for reading the text in the Tutorial I would have no reason to when all I want is download the program and attempt (we will see if it can find the esd folder - when I did the Hyper-V experiment it only found 2 esd files when searching for ext:esd in the Software Distribution\ Download folder. Good luck with the rewrite.
Builds from 2017 | BuildFeed
The furious pace they are describing is for real. Whether or not the present upgrade to 16296.0 works 16296.1 was uploadedd to buildfeed 4 hrs later.
I'm definitely going to wait for a 17xxx build to upgrade my physical machine.
I am on this build now. Took as usually less than an hour to upgrade the system and compress (ZIP MAX LVL) the UUP-setup files.
Nothing of the ordinary to report.