Announcing Windows 10 Insider Preview Build 16193 PC and 15213 Mobile Insider
-
What?
In decimal system, as well as in software / OS versioning, isn't 10.1 and 10.10 the the same? Ten and one tenth. Maybe if they had started from 10.00 and continued with 10.01, 10.02 and sow on they had covered versioning for 50 years,
,
Actually Winuser has made a good point. The decimal point can be considered to just be a separator i.e.
major version . minor version. very minor version etc.
It is just a numbering convention - that's all. 10.1 could be considered as 10.01, 10.001, 10.001 etc.
10.01 would be fine - it will see me easily for the rest of my life!
-
-
,
Actually Winuser has made a good point. The decimal point can be considered to just be a separator i.e.
major version . minor version. very minor version etc.
It is just a numbering convention - that's all. 10.1 could be considered as 10.01, 10.001, 10.001 etc.
10.01 would be fine - it will see me easily for the rest of my life!
We clearly need a new build to get back to the topic 
Anyway, here's the challenge:
Please provide a version history link to any application showing that for instance version 10.10 is later / newer version than version 10.9, or for instance that version 2.30 is later / newer than version 2.5.
-
-
We clearly need a new build to get back to the topic
Anyway, here's the challenge:
Yeah - downside of regular build upgrades is they are relatively minor in new features, and it does not take long to get bored with an upgrade - LOL
-
-
Having not a faintest clue when or why you have been proven correct last time and what are you referring to, here's a simple request:
Please provide a version history link to any application showing that for instance version 10.10 is later / newer version than version 10.9, or for instance that version 2.30 is later / newer than version 2.5.
Thank you in advance.
Kari
Admit, I agree with Kari on this. Logic is strong in this statement, but...
Vivaldi browser is another...
-
What?
In decimal system, as well as in software / OS versioning, isn't 10.1 and 10.10 the the same? Ten and one tenth. Maybe if they had started from 10.00 and continued with 10.01, 10.02 and sow on they had covered versioning for 50 years,
- it's not a number, it's a build descriptor..
-
-
This versioning discussion is somewhat amusing. In openSUSE dev land there was an extremely drawn out versioning discussion because it was decided that the next version of openSUSE Leap after version 42.3 (bizarre in itself) was going to be openSUSE Leap 15.
-
Anyone else having problem opening Feedback Hub?
I have tested the feedback app since yesterday afternoon again and again and get always the nice message, "Something went wrong"
Chris
-
-
- it's not a number, it's a build descriptor..
OK. The challenge remains:
Please provide a version history link to any application showing that for instance version 10.10 is later / newer version than version 10.9, or for instance that version 2.30 is later / newer than version 2.5.
The same edited to avoid any misunderstandings:
Please provide a version / build history link to any operating system or application showing that for instance version / build 10.10 is later / newer version than version / build 10.9, or for instance that version / build 2.30 is later / newer than version / build 2.5.
Quote
