New
#10
Its not just Softpedia reporting it now.............
http://www.zdnet.com/article/microso...tag=TREc64629f
Its not just Softpedia reporting it now.............
http://www.zdnet.com/article/microso...tag=TREc64629f
Not to worry.... they (MS) don't know either! Imagine if it were daily... eventually the slow ring would always be getting the fast ring from a week ago while fast ring was getting next week's slow ring and the ISO from last week's fast ring which slow ring would get the same day as fast ring, so slow ring could always do a clean install and .... whew!!! I'm getting dizzy!
Curiosity question...
If they were daily, or even weekly, and one build was not installed, intentionally or otherwise, what would happen? Are the builds prerequisite or cumlative? Can builds be skipped or must they be installed sequentially? It's easy to see that TOO fast could cause a real logjam!
I still say daily is not a good idea. Weekly is a maybe. Bi-weekly would be better.
I don't think business will be keen to upgrade if this happens in the real version of W10.
This is the reason why we have Patch Tuesday.