Page 8 of 14 FirstFirst ... 678910 ... LastLast

  1. Joined : Nov 2013
    Toronto
    Posts : 4,289
    Win 10 Pro x64
       02 Mar 2015 #71

    CountMike said: View Post
    Must be nice being rich .....or to have good credit rating.

    I'm just saying. I am not gonna get 1TBs. Haha.
    Probably 10 120TBs. And I am halfway there...
      My System SpecsSystem Spec


  2. Joined : Jul 2014
    Serbia
    Posts : 7,005
    All kinds
       02 Mar 2015 #72

    ThrashZone said: View Post
    On that note you'll be able to relate to a larger ssd and it should read allot faster whether it's for just personal files or both os...,
    Most of the issue is price so if anyone can get past that I don't see any advantage now days for using hdd's for anything 5200 or 7200 ssd's are better and create less heat,
    Brands well that is a toss up
    I like crucial but most people like Samsung's.
    I was thinking this one: Crucial.com - Crucial MX200 SSD product information it's a bit more expensive than Kingston but cheaper than 850EVO.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec


  3. Joined : Nov 2013
    Houston
    Posts : 1,397
    Win-7Prox64 Win-8.1Prox64 Win-10Prox64
       02 Mar 2015 #73

    badrobot said: View Post
    For your purpose John, speed is really of utmost importance. I would do the same. For most of us who are just regular users and testers, it's a different story.
    Very true,
    Although testing everything on an ssd might cloud real life for others but is a good test none the less,
    Real world not allot of machine come with ssd's so they would experience a different performance result,
    For 10tp I started out on an ssd and never had any issues,

    Once I switched to a hdd it got bricked,
    So possibly a ssd would be best but hdd's are disposable they're so cheap
      My System SpecsSystem Spec


  4. Joined : Nov 2013
    Toronto
    Posts : 4,289
    Win 10 Pro x64
       02 Mar 2015 #74

    CountMike said: View Post
    I was thinking this one: Crucial.com - Crucial MX200 SSD product information it's a bit more expensive than Kingston but cheaper than 850EVO.

    If you have a SATA3 system or planning to upgrade soon that's really a nice specs. With SATA2 mobo, you will barely reach 300MB/s.
    Good choice there.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec


  5. Joined : Nov 2013
    Houston
    Posts : 1,397
    Win-7Prox64 Win-8.1Prox64 Win-10Prox64
       02 Mar 2015 #75
      My System SpecsSystem Spec


  6. Joined : Jul 2014
    Serbia
    Posts : 7,005
    All kinds
       02 Mar 2015 #76

    badrobot said: View Post
    If you have a SATA3 system or planning to upgrade soon that's really a nice specs. With SATA2 mobo, you will barely reach 300MB/s.
    Good choice there.
    Yes, it's SATA 3 (600) on 6 channels, SATA2 on 4 and eSATA on 4. This MB is full of stuff, even PATA. Floppy, 2xCOM and 1 printer port, that's why I'm hanging to it and not going for FX8xxx. 7.1 sound, firewire, USB2 and 3, everything but SCSI of which I have a bunch but are small. 7.4 GB. You ask for it, this MB has it (well almost). Even if I change platform, I will keep it as a workhorse.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec


  7. Joined : Nov 2013
    Houston
    Posts : 1,397
    Win-7Prox64 Win-8.1Prox64 Win-10Prox64
       02 Mar 2015 #77

    Thanks for the reminded I just got this one
    http://www.amazon.com/Crucial-MX100-...9ZCZN8HX1JXFJX
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  8.    02 Mar 2015 #78

    JDobbsy1987 said: View Post
    I see, cheers.




    Was that in reply to a specific post?

    Hi there

    Yes - about the possible idea of using new technology FIXED storage -- i.e the storage is fixed to the MOBO rather like the chipset is today.

    Cheers
    jimbo
      My System SpecsSystem Spec


  9. Joined : Jul 2014
    Serbia
    Posts : 7,005
    All kinds
       02 Mar 2015 #79

    jimbo45 said: View Post
    Hi there

    Yes - about the possible idea of using new technology FIXED storage -- i.e the storage is fixed to the MOBO rather like the chipset is today.

    Cheers
    jimbo
    That's already done in small devices like phones etc. VLSI printed straight on the board.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec


  10. Joined : Jul 2014
    Belo Horizonte
    Posts : 710
    Windows 10 Build 14267
       02 Mar 2015 #80

    badrobot said: View Post
    512 is a waste. You only need 120GB. You don't really wanna mix your OS/programs and data. Put data on spinners. It's a lot easier and faster to fix a PC when data is separate. Image takes only 5 mins to complete, and a decision to clean install isn't hard to make.

    I have a 240gb that I switched with 120gb. I am using the 240gb as a test drive now.
    I'm planning a triple-boot system with Win8.1, Win10 and Ubuntu 14.10; moreover I intend to install all my production/scientific softwares and dozens of games on Windows 10 RTM. So it won't be a waste anyway... My work data and personal files will be kept in my big spinners, of course.

      My System SpecsSystem Spec


 
Page 8 of 14 FirstFirst ... 678910 ... LastLast


Similar Threads
Thread Forum
Two SSDs with Windows 8.1 and Build 10240. Upgrade path?
I have a dual boot system with two SSDs, with Windows 8.1 on one and Build 10240 on the other. At this stage I am confused by all the Microsoft posts about upgrading. Will I be able to upgrade to the new Build on the 29th on my Build 10240...
Windows Updates and Activation
Solved SSDs detected as CF?
I have 5 drives installed on my PC (1 HDD and 4 SSDs, the rest are just partitions). I am just wondering what does CF means on 2 of the SSDs. Does it stand for "compact flash"? How to fix this? Or should I just leave it alone? 6911
Drivers and Hardware
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 10 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 10" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 22:16.
Find Us
Twitter Facebook Google+



Windows 10 Forums