New
#30
A few years ago I would have said it would be suicide for M.S. to release an O.S. that..
1) Gave no choice over updates
2) Gave no information about updates
3) Installed 'payware' (solitaire) as default
4) Shared your bandwidth with other internet users and used your P.C. as a kind of storage device to distribute it's own O.S. by default
5) Intruded on my current O.S. and used crafty underhand tactics to try and get me to upgrade
When we are used to have M.S. decide exactly what we have on our PC (if we are running Windows) you cannot predict in any way what they will do, what may seem suicide now, may not seem so bad in the future... after all ..it is free, why complain
. . .does that mean the free El Captain for the mac system of computers was not really free. Does this mean that in the future that Apple is going to start charging me a service charge. . ., or is that only Microsoft that is going to do service charges. . .just wondering; nothing more. . .:)
Yes, they said that it would be the "last" OS, but they did not say that there would not be repeated reiterations like 10.2, 10.3,10.11, etc, ad infinium. Each new version could bring changes as dramatic as XP to Vista. Apple did this with their OSX and it's first iteration has very little in common with their current offering. Of course, we've read all this on the internet, so it has be true, right? They can't put anything on the internet that isn't true!
Maybe fees, maybe not, at least for the OS, but each new OS will likely make their other products (like Office) obsolete, requiring us to purchase new versions! Let's face it, Microsoft sells nothing but air! They don't even manufacture the disks that their air (intellectual property) is distributed on!
Well, probably, but do "YOU" actually know what that "new technology" may possibly be and if it will even be compatible with anything currently available. A perfect example is how in the beginning, IPv4 was adopted as the addressing system, providing what at the time seemed to more more addresses than would ever get used. Now IPv6 is being implemented because, guess what, we were running out of addresses in the IPv4 numbering system!
With all that said, I just don't like a company forcing me to change for the priveledge of making some of my software (that currently works just fine) obsolete, requiring me to repurchase it or purchase something else!
Just Sayin'
Gene
I believe the day will come when we will be charged a monthly fee for computer service. I can't see any other reason for MS to do the things they are doing. They want us to accept W 10 so badly that they are forcing it on our computers. There has got to be a reason they are so aggressive with this.
I saw a get started screen on a print screen photo that said the may be a fee. I wonder what that was about. I checked the photo again and it said there may be an internet fee.
Last edited by Emma; 17 Oct 2015 at 14:32.
I still have windows 7 and so far there have been NO forced upgrade attempts so what are you all talking about ?
I find a good analogy with Windows 10 to the recent Free-to-Play trend in the gaming industry.
It's "free" to play, but they'll nickel and dime us later with all the add-on features. $10 here, and $15 there . . . after a few years, we'd end up paying more than $100 in additional features. This is the reason why all the games are no longer included with Windows 10, and even a fairly essential function such as a DVD player was excluded.