Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

  1. Joined : Oct 2014
    Greece
    Posts : 26
    Windows 10
       03 Oct 2014 #11

    In my opinion, differences between x64 and x86 browser should be minor to end user.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  2.    03 Oct 2014 #12

    CountMike said: View Post
    Why sorry I can't find nothing wrong with those looks.
    Too "chromey" May as well just switch to Google.

    I either like two things in a browser: a more classic interface (like Seamonkey) or an IE 9/10/11 interface that's conventional but still sleek. Us Pale Moon fans have jumped ship to avoid having Australis pushed on us.

    Glad you like it just the same.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  3.    03 Oct 2014 #13

    Koub777 said: View Post
    In my opinion, differences between x64 and x86 browser should be minor to end user.
    They are (you'd have to open a LOT of tabs to see any difference) but it does seem that x64 browsers run more brisk.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec


  4. Joined : Oct 2014
    Manchester CT
    Posts : 272
    Windows 10 Fast Ring
       03 Oct 2014 #14

    Funny this. Mozilla HAD a working version of 64 bit FF and told the world that it had cancelled it about a couple of years ago. Now it is back? OK, I guess.

    Mozilla ceases work on 64-bit Firefox for Windows | bit-tech.net
      My System SpecsSystem Spec


  5. Joined : Jan 2014
    Carencro, LA 70520
    Posts : 7,632
    Windows 10
       03 Oct 2014 #15

    John Pombrio said: View Post
    Funny this. Mozilla HAD a working version of 64 bit FF and told the world that it had cancelled it about a couple of years ago. Now it is back? OK, I guess.

    Mozilla ceases work on 64-bit Firefox for Windows | bit-tech.net
    That might be because of Waterfox and Pale Moon and maybe more 64 bit Firefox clones.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec


  6. Joined : Sep 2014
    Posts : 47
    Windows 7 Ultimate
       03 Oct 2014 #16

    I use both Cyberfox and Firefox.

    They both are just as fast as the other.

    It might also depend on the system that these are installed on.

    Chrome is well, for the birds IMO. Hate it like the plague or Ebola.
    Gets into all aspects of your PC and then, try to get rid of it.

    As for add-ons, the one I use in Firefox run just as well in Cyberfox
    so, can't complain.

    Even tried IE 64bit when I was on Vista and tried it again on 7. I can't
    see any speed gains from either.


    Flashorn.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec

  7.    03 Oct 2014 #17

    I don't understand why chrome is so popular, so many people push it like the people on CNET or Engadet, leo laporte. Chrome extensions are far inferior to firefox, it contrary to popular myth does not handle memory better and is not any faster
      My System SpecsSystem Spec


  8. Joined : Aug 2014
    Australia, Adelaide
    Posts : 1,390
    W7 Ultimate SP1 (64 bit), LM 18.1 MATE (64 bit), W10IP VM, W10 Home
       03 Oct 2014 #18

    Jody Thornton said: View Post
    I've migrated to Pale Moon. I feel sorry for those with Australis on Firefox.
    Agreed.

    I let one of my Windows VMs update to FF32 (I need the latest browsers for my Web Development course).
    Even with the "Classic Theme Restorer" add-on, I can't set it up the way I like (i.e. like FF28 or PM24).

    JoeShades said: View Post
    I don't understand why chrome is so popular, so many people push it like the people on CNET or Engadet, leo laporte. Chrome extensions are far inferior to firefox, it contrary to popular myth does not handle memory better and is not any faster
    That has been my experience.

    Chrome uses stupid amounts of memory.
    The updater triggers 4 separate UAC prompts on my PC (so much for invisible background updating)!
    Last edited by lehnerus2000; 03 Oct 2014 at 20:49.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec


  9. Joined : Sep 2014
    Sydney NSW Australia
    Posts : 275
    Windows 10 Pro 64bit 1607 (14393.222)
       03 Oct 2014 #19

    I use Palemoon and have been for a while. It is very good and I doubt that Firefox will be much better.
    Firefox gave up on the 64 bit a while ago, it is strange that they have bothered with it again.
      My System SpecsSystem Spec


  10. Joined : Oct 2014
    Greece
    Posts : 26
    Windows 10
       04 Oct 2014 #20

    Whats about safety with 64bit version?
      My System SpecsSystem Spec


 
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast


Similar Threads
Thread Forum
Firefox - Set Custom URL for New Tabs
How to Set a Custom URL for New Tabs in Mozilla Firefox When using Mozilla Firefox web browser following installation, the new tab default setting opens with Firefox's recently visited webpages displayed in the form of a grid. The new tab setting...
Tutorials
Firefox is blocking Flash by default
Read more: After Facebook called for its death, now Firefox is blocking Flash by default
Windows 10 News
Firefox on build 10130
For some reason; the latest build of the tech preview keeps resetting my default browser from firefox to I believe internet explorer or the new one for 10 microsoft edge. Does anyone know why it keeps doing this? This seems to be a bug in the tech...
Browsers and Email
Internet Explorer acting like Firefox
I was on Yahoo and accessed the Games. I accessed the daily crossword and I got the ad bypass window that Firefox displays and then the game came up. I tried a couple of the other games and it did the same thing. One thing fixed...
Browsers and Email
IE 12 UI overhaul is a blend of Chrome and Firefox
Read more
Windows 10 News
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 10 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 10" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

Designer Media Ltd

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:24.
Find Us
Twitter Facebook Google+



Windows 10 Forums