KB5000842 Windows 10 Insider Beta 19043.906 21H1 and RP 19042.906 20H2 Insider

Page 12 of 15 FirstFirst ... 21011121314 ... LastLast

  1. Posts : 25,634
    Windows 11 Pro 22621.1
       #110

    f14tomcat said:
    Took roughly 30 minutes to make the ISO, but 6GB later I had a usable in-place and got to 19043.906.

    Anybody here who's on the Dev Insider....... I wonder who tested this pipeline?
    I did but it came up with the same result. Three minute boot time and slow. I deleted it and stayed with 19043.906. Meaning that I got the ISO from the dump to 30343.1000.
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 3,245
    Windows 10 and windows insider
       #111

    Josey Wales said:
    I did but it came up with the same result. Three minute boot time and slow. I deleted it and stayed with 19043.906. Meaning that I got the ISO from the dump to 30343.1000.
    I agree-this build (30343.1000) is really bad. About half the time the start menu displays a big blank square box. So difficult to navigate to anything with that kind of display. I am happy with 19043.906 and 19042.906 and have no problems with them!
    Last edited by magilla; 27 Mar 2021 at 04:06. Reason: Clarification of original post
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 46,476
    Windows 10 Home 64bit 21H1 and insider builds
       #112

    BrianInEngland said:
    I'm creating the ISO now, left it running while I watch TV for an hour or two!

    Update: ISO created, it's over 6GB in size? Is this right?
    Yes Brian. That's the CU's added does that.
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 1
    Windows 10 21H1
       #113

    EdTittel said:
    Wrote my story up as a blog post, but the short version is "UUPDump in-place repair install works." Check it out: When WU Repairs Fail Try UUPDump.
    --Ed--
    Thank you for the writeup, helped me a lot in doing a repair install using the ISO from the UUP website for the first time. Was very frustrating when I started getting the 0x800f081f error. Took a bit of time but happy to be on 19043.906.

    Samit
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 11,171
    Windows / Linux : Arch Linux
       #114

    Hi folks

    I tried the 19043.906 build again as a VM cloned via P2V from a running laptop -- the VM performs far better than the actual Physical system on roughly (it's impossible to say equal) similar performing hardware so I don't know what's going on but "Something isn't right" with this build. I tried to mirror the VM with approx the same resources as the physical machine - apart from utilising the really fast virtual I/O with the KVM SCSI virtio controller (from redhat on the win io drivers downloadable (free) from the fedora website).

    I still maintain that the base performance of W10 should be roughly similar to the server editions -- if any of you want to try the server editions there are some free trials around - just create a VM and see the difference !!. There can't be that much difference surely in the kernel for a server than the base Windows other than multi-user, probably a lot more security , ability to provide Virtual desktop infrastructure for clients and networking that works properly !!!

    Cheers
    jimbo
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 2
    Windows 10
       #115

    Hello, just a quick question.
    By using "Beta builds" from UUPDUMP i won't get updates in windows unless i login into "Windows insider program", right ?
    Thank you.
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 11,171
    Windows / Linux : Arch Linux
       #116

    DrNopt said:
    Hello, just a quick question.
    By using "Beta builds" from UUPDUMP i won't get updates in windows unless i login into "Windows insider program", right ?
    Thank you.
    No not correct
    Any build of Windows can be updated for "general type" updates e.g security etc via standard WU. What you won't get are specific updates that only get issued if you are enrolled into the appropriate insider build program for example cumulative updates for the next build. Things like Office if you have them will be updated also by WU if you enabled update automatically or update other Microsoft products as well as Windows.

    Even if enrolled to an insider ring (or whatever its called now) you don't have to login to Windows with a Microsoft account - a local one works perfectly.

    Cheers
    jimbo
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 2
    Windows 10
       #117

    Thank you Jimbo.
    I'm saying this because i was on the 19043.899 and didn't get this latest .906.
    Had to create iso and install. Installing the KB... for this build didn't work for me.
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 203
    Windows 10 Pro 21H1
       #118

    kado897 said:
    Yes Brian. That's the CU's added does that.
    Thanks, even the ISO direct ftom MS is over 5GB

    - - - Updated - - -

    MoKiChU said:
    This is good news, I'll hold off doing a UUP upgrade install for a few days
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 67
    Windows 10 Pro x64 - 21H2 (OS BUILD 19044.1202)
       #119

    EdTittel said:
    Wrote my story up as a blog post, but the short version is "UUPDump in-place repair install works." Check it out: When WU Repairs Fail Try UUPDump.
    --Ed--
    I was getting the same error updating 19043.899 to 19043.906 from WU.

    Created ISO with UUP and after the first attempt to install without lose my files and apps gave me the error 0x800f0830 - 0x20003.

    Had to disable Secure Boot UEFI in Bios, install it again and i'm on 19043.906.

    Thanks.

    KB5000842 Windows 10 Insider Beta 19043.906 21H1 and RP 19042.906 20H2-untitled.png
      My Computer


 

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 10 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 10" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:42.
Find Us




Windows 10 Forums