New
#20
Actually it makes perfect since (IMHO). . .:)HippsieGypsie, post: 34246, member: 99 said:
Actually it makes perfect since (IMHO). . .:)HippsieGypsie, post: 34246, member: 99 said:
Make no mistake about it. Their ultimate goal is an OS running across all devices. We see signs of this:
1. Layoffs concerning Windows Phone. No need for that department any more. Tons of money saved having one department writing OS code for all devices.
2. Omission of RT. Didn't work, so scrap it.
3. The writing of Office in Modern/Metro.
4. Out with the old bosses > In with the new ones with a new plan of attack on just how to present their ultimate goal.
I think they will reintroduce an optional Desktop Start Menu to appease those that want one to use.
You're right I am wrong. . .whatever. . .have a nice day. . .PaulGo, post: 34245, member: 275 said:
Since you are wrong you might as well learn to spell the name of your Apple OS correctly it is OS X Mavericks (version 10.9) not Maverik. :) As an Apple owner I thought you would appreciate how Apple choose to keep their Desktop OS separate from the Smartphone OS.Lee, post: 34257, member: 135 said:
You really not a nice person are you. . .have a nice life, and good bye.PaulGo, post: 34259, member: 275 said:
I was thinking 98 was the first to use 32bit processing, and was designed using elements of NT, but I am certainly no expert. I am still thinking that Windows Phone, RT and Windows will all use the same core designed around NT. The core will be updated but still use elements of it predecessor, and each platform will have their own special components, or am I mistaken?alphanumeric, post: 34243, member: 152 said:
The Windows 9x line were 16/32 bit hybrids and based on DOS. Windows 95, 98 and ME and I think even 3.1. None of those were NT based. The first Microsoft operating systems to use the NT core were actually called NT. Windows NT 3x, NT 4. With Windows 2000 and onward they dropped the NT from the name. 9x was consumer and NT was business up until ME/2000. Then it was one windows for everyone, or something like that.Trust_No1, post: 34270, member: 353 said:
Yes it appears Windows Phone, Windows RT and Windows will use the same NT Core. That's what it sounds like anyway. I'm not a programmer or coder so I can only imagine how that works. Windows Phone hardware is very similar to what Windows RT runs on so that shouldn't be a big deal, but a full Windows device is quit different. Anyway, it will be interesting times that's for sure.
I'll correct what I
I'll correct what I stated about"one OS" and RT with this:HippsieGypsie, post: 34248, member: 99 said:
http://www.eightforums.com/windows-8...sn-t-dead.html
I like the approach Microsoft is taking. It will maximize the number of quality applications on all platforms. Now if they can develop a great interface for the PC...HippsieGypsie, post: 34280, member: 99 said: