New
#260
So, somebody's idea of torture was to have me write FORTRAN code to calculate molecular orbitals for H2 on a PDP 11. This was pre-Fortran 77.
Well, though, I finally managed to purchase a Sperry 8088 running CP/M, WordStar. When I installed DOS 3.0, I was the luckiest M2 at Harvard Medical School. After I installed 3.11, it became shockingly obvious that my backup went maybe 3 directories deep. I was doing a concurrent PhD, and that's where my dissertation lived.
Illo tempore, jumping in the Charles River and swimming to Serbia had its allure.
Fun, fun, fun, only coding I was doing at that time was some BASIC and for numerical CNC machines that just started to appear, don't even remember what was in. Until then I had to contend with cam programed automatic machines and relay logic and that one required rewiring few dozen relays with up to 16 NO/NC contacts and miles of wires.
First numerical controls I have seen was some modular IBM stuff that took as much space in panel box as relays did but at least it could be programed from a PC via ladder diagram in DOS. That was real "fis-fiss, of what relief it is". Digital timers, wonderful. Adjustable no contact sensors = paradise.
There was some bumbling and fumbling around with Unix but I had stack of printouts with instructions just enough not to have to call $100/hour specialist to fix things all the time.
You completely missed the most important thing. When I said she was responding to my post, I meant the "vitriol" post!!!!!!! Lol. So what I wrote was NOT "attributing comments indiscriminately", I was pointing out that mine was the comment which produced the vitriol comment. And I wanted to defend and explain that I was NOT saying M$ needed to remove emoji's, but was listing an example of things they waste time on, when they have allowed many "real" problems with the core structure of the OS to go unattended to for months.
There have been tons of discusions on this very forum from a whole slew of posters who have complained time and time again about basic parts of Windows being broken and fixed over and over. You can search for the details, but I assume you can remember many of them as you were part of some of those conversations. So I am NOT alone in this sentiment. My point is, and has been for quite some time now, that M$ continually wastes time on periferal things while allowing more important common OS functionality to go unrepaired for months. I totally understand that 3rd party venders need to keep up with the changes, but to assume that it is COMPLETELY on the venders every single time, and that M$, being the angelic company they are being portrayed to be, have no responsibility in this is shallow thinking in my opinion. It is further my opinion that M$ is not nearly as customer centric as some of you perfer to believe they are. I believe they do try to market themselves as such, but their actions speak a completely different language. They have introduced features and then those features just disappear. They have broken parts of the OS, and fixed them, only to break them again a build later. They say that they are listening to the insiders, but more than an estimated 85% of the complaints and problems listed in the Insiders Hub go unattended to, and are never fixed. And I believe that they only pay attention to things they have on their agenda, and when those things jibe with some feedback, they take credit for listening to the insiders and giving them what they asked for. JMHO. If you feel differently I'm completely fine with that.
So, if I enable having Windows turn my screens off after a specific amount of time, my computer goes into some sort of weird state where, upon attempting to interact with it again (mouse movement, key press, [CTRL] + [ALT] + [DELETE] , etc.) leads to a ton of HD activity and then a forced reboot. If I disable that setting, it doesn't do that.
That is, by far, the strangest thing I've seen Windows do in a long time.
Definitely ready for a new build.