Cumulative Update KB4494441 Windows 10 v1809 Build 17763.503 - May 14 Win Update

Guitarmageddon said:

Ok thanks. I figured they would have updated here and here?
http://www.catalog.update.microsoft....aspx?q=4465065
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/...rocode-updates

- - - Updated - - -


Ok thanks will keep checking.

That's old Dimitri, It doesn't contain anything for the 9900K and that has µcode update according to Intel.

Cliff S said:

That's old Dimitri, It doesn't contain anything for the 9900K and that has µcode update according to Intel.

I stand corrected....and I apologize!
You're absolutely right mate. For the newly announced MDS vulnerabilities they are up to 1709.
Last section, in the Summary of Intel microcode updates

IronZorg89 said:

I have not tried it yet, but would like to know if you come up with that infamous error 6824:

Attachment 233727

That is an old screenshot.

A relatively painless fix for all those errors with DISM cleanup. Run it all in Safe Mode. I got tired of having to reboot over and over to get some object unlocked or to behave..... so have been running all DISM cleanup commands in Safe Mode, and no issues. Added benefit..... you should reboot after DISM work anyway, so going back to Normal Boot takes care of that step.

bagavan said:

I thought the cumulative update increased the build number to 17763.503

What Bree said about 17134.765 applies to Windows 10 version 1803

17763.503 applies to Windows 10, version 1809

OK, so now I'm puzzled. I also experienced what others reported here -- thanks to @khanmein and @IronZorg89 for their follow-ups which quoted my earlier post to this thread -- and had to install KB4494441 TWICE to get to .503. Here's what I see in my update history on the production PC as an example:

What's the deal here? I'm a little surprised and puzzled by this phenomenon. There's no longer any doubt in my mind that two installs of the same CU are required to get completely up-to-level (.503). But I'd like to know why? Anybody got an explanation, or some idea of what's happening here? TIA,
--Ed--