New
#30
There's nothing to say it isn't to be for Home, and the whole theme of the post is 'putting users in control'. Then there's this (with my bold)...
Either way, I'll be able to tell for certain some time in late May, seeing as I have several machines running HomeWe will provide notification that an update is available and recommended based on our data, but it will be largely up to the user to initiate when the update occurs.
OK, that's good for the Windows Home users, for sure. Still, the Home user should have the same options I as a Pro user have. I just watched a ZDNet video where Ed Bott and Mary Jo Foley both said pretty much the same.
I rarely postpone updates unless something goes terribly wrong, but when that happens, I wind up restoring via backup, then postponing updates from there!
I don't understand why the Home user shouldn't have the same options I have. Most new computers only come with Windows 10 Home by default, and it costs almost $200.00 more ($179 more IIRC) to get Pro. I know this because I just helped one of my Windows 10 students buy a new laptop. It's beside the point that all he needs is Home.
Yes, I think that's what it's saying. RP (18362/19h1/1903/May Update/???) to Insiders starting next week, the version that will become public after tweaking and massaging and fixing for a while, released in late May.
Meanwhile, my Orioles lost their opener to the Yankees.............. 8-4.
According to MS, not me, that is correct as far as I understand it.
EDIT: You changed your post after I replied. Don't know about setting up a teaching laptop with Release Preview. Guess if you did, and did all the updates, it would get the upgrade next week sometime, I really do not know what the MS dole-it-out schedule will be.
What MS really needs to do is give us back the granular control we had over WU, a la Win7.