Cumulative Update KB4482887 Windows 10 v1809 Build 17763.348 - March 1 Win Update

Page 31 of 34 FirstFirst ... 212930313233 ... LastLast

  1. Posts : 19,518
    W11+W11 Developer Insider + Linux
       #300

    What is KB after 17763.107 and one after that ?
      My Computers


  2. Posts : 68,880
    64-bit Windows 11 Pro for Workstations
    Thread Starter
       #301

    CountMike said:
    What is KB after 17763.107 and one after that ?

    Hello Mike,

    Here you go:

    https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/...update-history

    Cumulative Update KB4482887 Windows 10 v1809 Build 17763.348 - March 1-1809_history.jpg
      My Computers


  3. Posts : 208
    Win 10
       #302

    ddelo said:
    According to some benchmarking done, form @EdKiefer, it seems that there is a small performance improvement. Nothing major, but at least not degradation
    I had my values 400 and 400 in tests.
    I had used Inspectre tool when it came out and disabled both meltdown/Spectre so my values for disabled were FeatureSettingsOverride 3 and FeatureSettingsOverrideMask 3, if you enabled both with the tool you get FeatureSettingsOverride 0 and FeatureSettingsOverrideMask 3.

    Now I rechecked what FeatureSettingsOverride 400 and FeatureSettingsOverrideMask 403, the PS script gives the same output values as 400/400 values.
    So I don't know if there is a difference, to enable SSBD you would need 408 for FeatureSettingsOverride.
    I am not sure on 400 verse 403 with FeatureSettingsOverrideMask as I didn't enable it or test it.
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 2,450
    Windows 10 Pro x64
       #303

    EdKiefer said:
    I had my values 400 and 400 in tests.
    I had used Inspectre tool when it came out and disabled both meltdown/Spectre so my values for disabled were FeatureSettingsOverride 3 and FeatureSettingsOverrideMask 3, if you enabled both with the tool you get FeatureSettingsOverride 0 and FeatureSettingsOverrideMask 3.

    Now I rechecked what FeatureSettingsOverride 400 and FeatureSettingsOverrideMask 403, the PS script gives the same output values as 400/400 values.
    So I don't know if there is a difference, to enable SSBD you would need 408 for FeatureSettingsOverride.
    I am not sure on 400 verse 403 with FeatureSettingsOverrideMask as I didn't enable it or test it.
    If you have installed the latest microcode, suggested by Intel, from a BIOS/UEFI update from the manufacturer of the system, or if you have installed the latest Microsoft microcode updates for 1803/1809, you don't need the old registry entries neither with 8 nor with 0 for FeatureSettingsOverride. So, just the Retpoline values of 400 for FeatureSettingsOverride and 400 for FeatureSettingsOverrideMask, are sufficient.

    More info here
    Enable Retpoline to mitigate Spectre variant 2 (CVE-2017-5715) Solved - Windows 10 Forums
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 1,961
    Windows 10 Pro x64
       #304

    " 408 for FeatureSettingsOverride ".........made my system slower in performance , I went to "0" ............
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 19,518
    W11+W11 Developer Insider + Linux
       #305

    Brink said:
    Tnx. I want to install them one by one to see when i encountered that loss of performance in some games.
      My Computers


  7. Posts : 208
    Win 10
       #306

    ddelo said:
    If you have installed the latest microcode, suggested by Intel, from a BIOS/UEFI update from the manufacturer of the system, or if you have installed the latest Microsoft microcode updates for 1803/1809, you don't need the old registry entries neither with 8 nor with 0 for FeatureSettingsOverride. So, just the Retpoline values of 400 for FeatureSettingsOverride and 400 for FeatureSettingsOverrideMask, are sufficient.

    More info here
    Enable Retpoline to mitigate Spectre variant 2 (CVE-2017-5715) Solved - Windows 10 Forums
    Yup, all up to date, I use microcode update as bios is to old for Asus to update it.

    I was hopeing the retpoline would bring the I/O back up a bit but I am not seeing that at least with Crystaldiskmark.
    Last edited by EdKiefer; 11 Mar 2019 at 12:22.
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 1,961
    Windows 10 Pro x64
       #307

    " I was hoping the reptoline would bring the I/O back up a bit but I am not seeing that at least with Crystaldiskmark. "........same on my rig ; Z97-K Asus .
    Wish Asus will update BIOS , still on 2017-version.........
    Have set both values on 400 , safe but certainly not faster then disabled....!
    Always the question which to go for ; maximum protection ( costs performance) or go for speed ( maximum performance , no optimal protection )...............
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 1,248
    Windows 10 Pro (Build 19043.1110)
       #308

    Just for the record, and to avoid confusion, it's 'retpoline', not 'reptoline'.
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 19,518
    W11+W11 Developer Insider + Linux
       #309

    sgage said:
    Just for the record, and to avoid confusion, it's 'retpoline', not 'reptoline'.
    Yeah, otherwise it would be a crocodile
      My Computers


 

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 10 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 10" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 19:53.
Find Us




Windows 10 Forums