Windows 10 October 2018 Update rollout now paused
-
Hi there.
I know it sounds callous but surely if you had 25 years of photos that you treasured would you only have them on one piece of media -- I've still got some of my old negatives (35 mm) from the time before digital cameras became even half way decent and affordable and if shove came to push I could still even develop these the old fashioned way with a developing tank (black and white stuff) - apart from re-scanning again etc.
I know that shouldn't excuse an OS from wiping people's data but I can't really have sympathy with people who don't at least make some provision for dealing with potential problems with archiving data -- we've all being going on for years that people should always have backup never mind how primitive it is --even bog standard file explorer to external devices is infinitely better than none -- and external devices are cheap these days.
Sorry there but this is one "sob story" I have zero sympathy for. (I'm not usually mean BTW but this is a case of "serves you right").
Cheers
jimbo
I completely agree, but sometimes it just doesnt factor into people's thought until the deed is done.
-
I completely agree, but sometimes it just doesnt factor into people's thought until the deed is done.
Well I disagree.. there are oldies out there that need to be considered.. they grew up in a protected environment.
It's not expected that they are tech savvy... they are still thinking Kodak film that can be reproduced... not digital.
-
Just how much of digital photography was there 25 years ago ?
-
-
Just how much of digital photography was there 25 years ago ?
You missed the point... it's not about photography.
-
Its about loosing your personal files.
-
-
You missed the point... it's not about photography.
The story was about 25 year old digital pictures.
-
I've got about 2.5 TB of photo history on my harddrives. That includes photos from 40 years ago. Nothing special about that.
-
The story was about 25 year old digital pictures.
I have pictures that old that I have scanned in.
-
I have pictures that old that I have scanned in.
I have stereoscopic glass plates from 1903 of my grandmother's wedding but those are not digital.
-
Hi there.
I know it sounds callous but surely if you had 25 years of photos that you treasured would you only have them on one piece of media -- I've still got some of my old negatives (35 mm) from the time before digital cameras became even half way decent and affordable and if shove came to push I could still even develop these the old fashioned way with a developing tank (black and white stuff) - apart from re-scanning again etc.
I know that shouldn't excuse an OS from wiping people's data but I can't really have sympathy with people who don't at least make some provision for dealing with potential problems with archiving data -- we've all being going on for years that people should always have backup never mind how primitive it is --even bog standard file explorer to external devices is infinitely better than none -- and external devices are cheap these days.
Sorry there but this is one "sob story" I have zero sympathy for. (I'm not usually mean BTW but this is a case of "serves you right").
Cheers
jimbo
I agree 100% with this. I can not feel sorry for people that have lost "valuable" data because they never bothered to back up their precious pictures.