New
#90
Sorry - don't get what you mean - Yes things are done in sequence but here we have 2 computers both on the list with the same status so i would expect them to behave the same
Please revisit my 2 screen shots from the Intel master List - you will see that both the 206A7 and the 306C3 have the same status. That implies that both have been completed in their turn and that KB4090007 should have the same effect on both. But it doesn't.
I was just joking....as I have 35 years in IT, I have learned (most of the times, the hard way) that although computers do exactly what we tell them to do, sometimes things do not make much sense and we have to dig more!
Now seriously, your situation does not make sense. Especially the fact that the 306C3 has not been updated. The only thing that I can think of, is that your specific one, was not affected by the Spectre vulnerability. Thus it shows by Inspectre as OK.
Craig, I think you got it wrong. The patch has been applied, that's the reasin for the slow performance. The question is why although the patch is applied it shows as NOT protected
First start by finding the microcode revision you currently have and check it against Intel's list.
I may be way behind the times here but has this CU ended creating Homegroups?