New
#170
I know, but sometimes paths to the location of wims and to the targets can be convoluted.
I should be less lazy.
Here's something for you guys to test, who can't UUPtoISO atm. Extract the attached zip to your UUPtoISO root folder and execute ActionListParser.cmd before running UUPtoISO.cmd.
I have written these tools just for testing purposes, the exe is not signed so your Windows might nag.
ActionListParser.zip
In 95% of all times I've applied a Windows image the source path has been a network share, X:\install.wim, and target C:\.
Anyway, that's totally irrelevant and, if you let me say so, a completely invalid argument to use trying to show that wimlib-imagex is easier to use: you use the same target and source paths regardless if you are using DISM or wimlib-imagex.
Or are you trying to tell us that if WIM file is located let's say in X:\DeploymentImages\Public\Windows\Version_1607\Enterprise\x64\EN-GB folder, you somehow need to use that path with DISM but don't have to use it with wimlib-imagex?
Well! Good news is that both the ESD and the mountain of Download files worked just fine in their respective scripts. Even in VMs.
YMMV
:)
NoteTweet
— Twitter API (@user) View on Twitter
PLEASE NOTICE:
The tool and the method in this tutorial both work without issues with UUP upgrade files of the latest Insider Build 15048 released earlier today.
Kari
I am sorry but I have some difficulties to understand your comment?
I've tested making a few ISO images tonight from build 15048 UUP upgrade and wanted to continue the same tradition I've had in ESD to ISO tutorial since beginning, and here since UUP upgrade was introduced by posting a note saying it works with THIS (I repeat: THIS!) build.
I never post these notes before testing it first, creating both ESD and UUP ISO images and doing a test clean install. Only then, only when I have made ISO using method told in this tutorial and successfully installed Windows 10 using it, only then will I post the note.
And your comment to that is "it might not work on next build". I have to start using it myself; when Brink posts in News section about a new app, I'll post "yeah but it will most probably not work with Creators Update". Good old negativity.
That's the spirit!
Anyway, track record is if not perfect A but at least a nice B+: 9th UUP build, 7th allowing us to make ISO.
Really?