Latest Realtek HD Audio Driver Version [2]

Page 25 of 46 FirstFirst ... 15232425262735 ... LastLast
  1.    #241

    Realtek HD Audio Driver 6.0.8757.1 (FF00 = Generic) WHQL now available for download.
      My ComputerSystem Spec

  2. Cliff S's Avatar
    Posts : 22,429
    Win10 Pro, Win10 Pro N, Win10 Home, Win10 Pro Insider Fast Ring, Windows 8.1 Pro, Ubuntu
       #242

    asturias7 said: View Post
    Realtek HD Audio Driver 6.0.8757.1 (FF00 = Generic) WHQL now available for download.
    ROG has 8757.1 now too for UAD

    Realtek HD Audio Drivers (UAD - ASUS ROG) - Last version [17/07/2019] :
    ----Drivers : 6.0.8757.1 WHQL
    ----SS3 Extension Driver : 1.2.5.59003 WHQL
    ----NH3/SS3 APO SoftwareComponent Driver : 1.4.2.0 WHQL
    ----DTSX Ultra APO4x Extension Driver : 1.0.4.0 WHQL
    ----DTS APO4x Service SoftwareComponent Driver : 1.0.20.0 WHQL
    ----DTS APO4x Core SoftwareComponent/SoftwareDevice Driver : 1.0.20.0 WHQL


    Realtek HD Audio Drivers (UAD - ASUS PRIME-TUF) - Last version [17/07/2019] :
    ----Drivers : 6.0.8757.1 WHQL
    ----DTSX Ultra APO4x Extension Driver : 1.0.4.0 WHQL
    ----DTS APO4x Service SoftwareComponent Driver : 1.0.20.0 WHQL
    ----DTS APO4x Core SoftwareComponent/SoftwareDevice Driver : 1.0.20.0 WHQL
    ----DTS HPXv1 APO3x Extension Driver : 1.0.18.1 WHQL
    ----DTS HPXv1 APO3x SoftwareComponent Driver : 2.0.0.1 WHQL
    ----DTS Custom APO3x Extension Driver : 1.0.9.0 WHQL
    ----DTS Custom APO3x SoftwareComponent Driver : 1.1.10.1 WHQL
    ----DTS APO3x SoftwareComponent/SoftwareDevice Driver : 1.0.17.0 WHQL
      My ComputersSystem Spec

  3. Cliff S's Avatar
    Posts : 22,429
    Win10 Pro, Win10 Pro N, Win10 Home, Win10 Pro Insider Fast Ring, Windows 8.1 Pro, Ubuntu
       #243

    8757 bass is muffled sounding, and too overbearing, plus the punch & kick is too soft
    8751 is better in my opinion.
      My ComputersSystem Spec

  4.    #244

    " 8751 is better in my opinion "................do you have a link to 8751 UAD Nahimic .............??!
      My ComputerSystem Spec

  5.    #245

    8757 UAD worked Perfectly fine on my systems!
    its a insane difference in sound between UAD / HDA or it placebo?
      My ComputerSystem Spec


  6. Posts : 6
    64-bit Windows 10 Pro 1903 build 18362.239
       #246

    So I ended up installing the 8648 HDA FF10 drivers first, as a good starting point.. they sound good! Probably bit better overall than what it was. Not sure if it's worth upgrading to 8703? (Latest FF10 driver and since it's certified for 1903/19H1). Or am I able to install 8750 HDA FF00 drivers and does that just not let me use the Sound Blaster X-Fi MB3 software? (which I can probably live without) (Am I able to install FF00 drivers or am I Iimited to just FF10 drivers?)

    larc919 said: View Post
    I'm really not hearing any difference in 8648 running in 1809 or 1903. But I may give Realtek HD 8703.1 a try anyway.
    larc919 - Did you end up trying 8703, how do they compare to 8648?
      My ComputerSystem Spec



  7. Posts : 628
    Windows 7 Home Premium x64
       #247

    Damon8 said: View Post
    So I ended up installing the 8648 HDA FF10 drivers first, as a good starting point.. they sound good! Probably bit better overall than what it was. Not sure if it's worth upgrading to 8703? (Latest FF10 driver and since it's certified for 1903/19H1). Or am I able to install 8750 HDA FF00 drivers and does that just not let me use the Sound Blaster X-Fi MB3 software? (which I can probably live without) (Am I able to install FF00 drivers or am I Iimited to just FF10 drivers?)



    larc919 - Did you end up trying 8703, how do they compare to 8648?
    well Damon8, you could install & use FF00 drivers but the downside of doing that is that the X-Fi MB3 software will not recognize your Realtek audio device because the mbapo232.dll & mbapo264.dll files are missing and proper Creative registry entries are not there.

    In the following section of the HDXMB3H.inf file:

    -------------------
    [MBTHX32.AddReg]
    HKCR,TypeLib\%MBTHX32_TypeLib%\1.0\0\win32,,0,%10%\SysWOW64\MBAPO232.dll
    HKCR,Wow6432Node\AppID\CTAPO.DLL,AppID,0,%MBTHX32_AppID%
    HKCR,Wow6432Node\AppID\%MBTHX32_AppID%,,0,"CTAPO"
    HKCR,Wow6432Node\CLSID\%CLSID_MBTHX32_EffectNodeInfo%,,0,"CEffectNodeInfo Class"
    HKCR,Wow6432Node\CLSID\%CLSID_MBTHX32_EffectNodeInfo%\InProcServer32,,0,%10%\SysWOW64\MBAPO232.dll
    HKCR,Wow6432Node\CLSID\%CLSID_MBTHX32_EffectNodeInfo%\InProcServer32,ThreadingModel,0,Both
    HKCR,Wow6432Node\CLSID\%CLSID_MBTHX32_LFX%,,0,"CTAPOContainerLFX Class"
    HKCR,Wow6432Node\CLSID\%CLSID_MBTHX32_LFX%\InProcServer32,,0,%10%\SysWOW64\MBAPO232.dll
    HKCR,Wow6432Node\CLSID\%CLSID_MBTHX32_LFX%\InProcServer32,ThreadingModel,0,Both
    HKCR,Wow6432Node\CLSID\%CLSID_MBTHX32_GFX%,,0,"CTAPOContainerGFX Class"
    HKCR,Wow6432Node\CLSID\%CLSID_MBTHX32_GFX%\InProcServer32,,0,%10%\SysWOW64\MBAPO232.dll
    HKCR,Wow6432Node\CLSID\%CLSID_MBTHX32_GFX%\InProcServer32,ThreadingModel,0,Both
    HKCR,Wow6432Node\CLSID\%CLSID_MBTHX32_SFX%,,0,"CTAPOContainerSFX Class"
    HKCR,Wow6432Node\CLSID\%CLSID_MBTHX32_SFX%\InProcServer32,,0,%10%\SysWOW64\MBAPO232.dll
    HKCR,Wow6432Node\CLSID\%CLSID_MBTHX32_SFX%\InProcServer32,ThreadingModel,0,Both
    HKCR,Wow6432Node\CLSID\%CLSID_MBTHX32_MFX%,,0,"CTAPOContainerMFX Class"
    HKCR,Wow6432Node\CLSID\%CLSID_MBTHX32_MFX%\InProcServer32,,0,%10%\SysWOW64\MBAPO232.dll
    HKCR,Wow6432Node\CLSID\%CLSID_MBTHX32_MFX%\InProcServer32,ThreadingModel,0,Both
    HKCR,Wow6432Node\CLSID\%CLSID_MBTHX32_EFX%,,0,"CTAPOContainerEFX Class"
    HKCR,Wow6432Node\CLSID\%CLSID_MBTHX32_EFX%\InProcServer32,,0,%10%\SysWOW64\MBAPO232.dll
    HKCR,Wow6432Node\CLSID\%CLSID_MBTHX32_EFX%\InProcServer32,ThreadingModel,0,Both

    the entries highlighted in bold letters are only included in FF10 drivers and are left out in other FFxx driver versions like FF00, FF01 & so on.

    pietcorus2 said: View Post
    " 8751 is better in my opinion "................do you have a link to 8751 UAD Nahimic .............??!
    currently no, but I could try getting 8751 uad nahimic for you if I have time later this week
      My ComputersSystem Spec

  8.    #248

    Thanks man ! Will wait for it ...............
      My ComputerSystem Spec

  9.    #249

    Damon8 said: View Post
    larc919 - Did you end up trying 8703, how do they compare to 8648?
    Yes, I did and am not hearing much difference, if any. OTOH, I'm not detecting that 8703 is running any better on 19H1 than 8648 did.
      My ComputerSystem Spec

  10.    #250

    8757 ~=> 8751 {HDA}

    I do like the definition / separation even better; bass about the same here; sounds all-around good to me.
    Last edited by IntelliMoo; 4 Weeks Ago at 16:39.
      My ComputerSystem Spec


 
Page 25 of 46 FirstFirst ... 15232425262735 ... LastLast

Related Threads
Latest Realtek High Definition Audio Codecs :arrow: Microsoft Update Catalog Realtek download page Latest info now here - Latest Realtek HD Audio Driver Version
Latest Realtek HD audio driver R2.82 in Drivers and Hardware
Just noticed that the latest Realtek HD Audio driver R2.82 which seems to be included with the 1903 Windows 10 release preview removes the option to re-assign jacks (rear and front) to different sources such as front output. A bit annoying if you...
Clean up of main thread - Latest Realtek HD Audio Driver Version - Windows 10 Forums
Archive of old posts from Latest Realtek HD Audio Driver Version - Windows 10 Forums
I'm currently running driver version .7541 however can't seem to get .7571 to work (located herehttps://www.tenforums.com/drivers-hardware/5993-latest-realtek-hd-audio-driver-version.html.) Downloaded and extracted fine however whenever I try to run...
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 10 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 10" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 23:49.
Find Us