QUESTION: Efficacy of Running Portable Apps on Internal Hard Drive ?

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

  1. Posts : 128
    WIN 10
       #1

    QUESTION: Efficacy of Running Portable Apps on Internal Hard Drive ?


    Hello, Power Users:

    I imagine this question has been asked often... but I can NOT find it anywhere... in this forum... or Google Search... PortableApps.com... but could not find an answer to this question:

    • What is the efficacy or downside of copying and running portable apps to a notebook SSD or HDD?

    Copying a PORTABLE APP is CLEANER than an installation... and would eliminate the constant drive fragmentation associated with software installs.

    What am I missing in connecting the dots? LOL.

    Thanks in advance for prompt and detailed responses.

    ~ Alan
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 8,107
    windows 10
       #2

    It depends what apps if it's small it's not a problem but if it's something like Photoshop it will still write to disk
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 128
    WIN 10
    Thread Starter
       #3

    Samuria said:
    It depends what apps if it's small it's not a problem but if it's something like Photoshop it will still write to disk
    Howdy, Samuria.

    I'm originally considering Google Chrome, and utilities.

    THX. ~ Alan
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 31,651
    10 Home x64 (22H2) (10 Pro on 2nd pc)
       #4

    Fragmentation isn't an issue, as by default automatic maintenance regularly defragments the drive anyway.

    The main downside is that a Portable App takes a little longer to load when you first open it. There's a portable app environment that has to be loaded first. Once opened, there seems to be little difference.
      My Computers


  5. Posts : 128
    WIN 10
    Thread Starter
       #5

    Hi, Bree:

    You don't think there's much advantage to minimizing REGISTRY population?
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 5,452
    Windows 11 Home
       #6

    It is going to be a little harder for Windows to find and manage portable software, especially if you want to use them as default, you would have to assign them manually. By the way, even portable software writes something to the registry, otherwise it would not work, you will just have Windows apps and Portable apps separate and that is it. It is not better or worse, it is just optional. I use PatchMyPC, which auto-downloads and auto-installs most software for me, similar to PortableApps, which I also use, but only on my USB.

    ab1kenobee said:
    Copying a PORTABLE APP is CLEANER than an installation... and would eliminate the constant drive fragmentation associated with software installs.
    Unless you do not intend to update them, there is always going to be drive fragmentation.
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 128
    WIN 10
    Thread Starter
       #7

    TairikuOkami said:
    It is going to be a little harder for Windows to find and manage portable software, especially if you want to use them as default, you would have to assign them manually. By the way, even portable software writes something to the registry, otherwise it would not work, you will just have Windows apps and Portable apps separate and that is it. It is not better or worse, it is just optional. I use PatchMyPC, which auto-downloads and auto-installs most software for me, similar to PortableApps, which I also use, but only on my USB.


    Unless you do not intend to update them, there is always going to be drive fragmentation.
    Howdy, TairikuOkami.

    I had better. Portable apps over the years and came to understand they were completely independent of the windows registry period period period but apparently not.

    Apparently there's no bias or enthusiasm that portable apps outside of using them on a USB.

    Appreciate.

    ~ Alan
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 5,452
    Windows 11 Home
       #8

    The problem is the common name "portable apps". Each portable app is different, it has different requirements, it was created using "cheats" to run portable and more robust apps, like office, require more integration to Windows. Portable name only guarantees, that you can run it without installing, nothing else. Take an on-demand scanner Zemana portable for example, you run and then remove it, but it install 2 drivers, which keeps running forever and might conflict with realtime AV, like cause BSOD.
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 10,929
    Win10 x64
       #9

    Sorry for a bit off topic but I have deleted Zemana portable after finding what you posted. I had to use Autoruns in admin mode to delete the ZAM drivers, reboot then clean the registry and files from C:\Windows and C:\Windows\System32\drivers folders. That IS NOT A PORTABLE if you ask me. Services and registry?

    I really appreciate the heads up on that. I will never use their program again.

    Many thanks @TairikuOkami
    Last edited by Access Denied; 16 Apr 2018 at 19:33.
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 4,666
    Windows 10 Pro x64 21H1 Build 19043.1151 (Branch: Release Preview)
       #10

    True portable apps does not install any drivers, nor install any keys in the registry. You can run portable apps from any medium that has some sort of write support, since they still need to store their configuration somewhere. That is local HDDs, Thumb Drives and Memory Cards.

    I have been using portable apps exactly for this reason, on devices/computers where my user account has had limited access. If my above statement weren't true, I could never run portable apps on these devices because of permission restrictions.
      My Computers


 

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 10 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 10" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06.
Find Us




Windows 10 Forums