Installed CU4.1 3.0.6. 1469-10103 and it did solve the problem where Windows Defender Real-Time Protection was disabled with previous MBAM version installed.

I've been running MBAM component package 1.0.50 for several weeks without problems, although updating to 1.0.75 caused BSODs again so I went back to .50. Installed the latest, 1.0.96 today and no...

I know what your saying. I really hate adding programs like Revo though to do things I think the OS should do well enough natively.

It's possible as when I built this system I installed 3.0, although I've used mbclean twice today which you'd think would clean it up. Right now 1469 has run well the last two weeks and now that it...

123431

Yea, that's why I corrected it so no one would get confused and look for it at their site. Thanks for correcting that since as you say these version numbers can get confusing enough.

They've also confused me when they go from a version that works on this box to one that reverts to the behavior that the original 3.0 exhibited. Two steps forward and one step back is the method to...

I stand corrected as I'd thought that they went from 1469 to 1475 when I saw the 75 at the end. I fixed it in the original post.

Yea, don't know what it is about 3.0 on so many systems, especially when this is an all new one. Disappointed as I had thought they were getting the problems resolved and were on their way to having...

Installed 1.0.75 over 1469 and within two minutes being on the Internet had a bad pool header error just as when 3.0 was first released and that occurred on the old build computer and also the very...

I know that Malwarebytes says to use mbclean if you're having problems but although 1469 was working well I figured no harm to clean uninstall it before installing the latest. I'll try right now to...

I've had 3.06.1469 running fine on this machine the last couple of weeks; downloaded this latest build about an hour ago and used the clean uninstaller Malwarebytes puts out to uninstall 1469 and...

I had BSODs which occurred as soon as I'd go on the Internet when MBAM 3 first was released and had a support ticket going for awhile; but the latest version (3.06.1469, non beta) has been good...

The taskbar tray takes only 4.5mb, the service itself takes almost 280mb. Far too much unless Malwarebytes thinks that it is four programs in one and so only 70mb per. Windows Defender takes about...

I've searched the Internet but not found much on this problem. I've told Malwarebytes that I'm trying a test with the Shadow Defender (SD) program disabled to see if that is causing MBAM 3 to...

Happened again today. Open MBAM 3.06.1469 and it has reverted back to the free version and all the real time "protections" are disabled. Uninstalled and went back to 2.2.

I'm going to copy and paste here what I wrote this morning over at the Malwarebytes forum:

Just FYI, I've had Malwarebytes 3.06.1469 running well for about a week after having problems with...

Winuser, on the machine where MBAM disables Windows Defender I wonder what the setting is in MBAM for registering with Windows Action Center. From the MBAM 3 FAQ:

Question: "Since Malwarebytes...

In my regular user account all settings for Defender are grayed out as they should be; but both Real time and Cloud based protections are in the On position and when Defender is opened it shows Real...

I won't be trying MBAM 3 again for some time. I had many problems including BSODs when Web protection was enabled on the prior build of this box (Core i7 920), and MBAM support pointed at a possibly...

I agree with your post where you speak of people having problems which must be discussed as others may well have the same problems. I upgraded to 3.05 today and had bad pool header problems when...