New
#951
Well. I used AMD most of the time, ever since 386/486 and it was a tossup with Intel most of the. They were never much behind and price was right, price/performance always favored AMD. At some times they were ahead like with Athlon vs. P4, first dual and multi core CPUs. Phenom series were really good and most except few were unlocked for OC. FX series were lacking in single core performance because of stupid architecture, (2 cores per module) but always had more cores for price.
What puts me off with Intel is their attitude and some times unfair practices. Yes they were better at some times and some CPUs but not 1007200/300 0r more $$ better.
Ryzen changed a lot performance wise with low TDP and power requirements and became truly modern CPU while Intel gave some more of same stuff thru several generations and had to lower prices substantially just to stay competitive.