Crucial SSD vs Samsung SSD performance comparison question


  1. gil
    Posts : 193
    Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64-bit 10586 Multiprocessor Free
       #1

    Crucial SSD vs Samsung SSD performance comparison question


    Hi.

    Just curious about the 4K test between two Nvme SSDs.
    On the left is a 2TB Crucial, PCIe-3 which is scoring 138.9.
    On the right is a 2TB Samsung Pro PCIe-4 that is scoring 86.4. My system supports Nvme PCIe-4, as I'm using Intel Gen 11 and Gigabyte Z590 motherboard. The Samsung drive is mounted where PCIe-4 is supported and it is also a PCIe-4 nvme drive. The Crucial is PCIe-3 mounted where only PCIe-3 is supported.

    How come Crucial beats Samsung in this test?

    Crucial SSD vs Samsung SSD performance comparison question-crucial-pci3-not-random-benchmark.pngCrucial SSD vs Samsung SSD performance comparison question-samsung-pro-2tb-pci4.png
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 5,048
    Windows 10/11 Pro x64, Various Linux Builds, Networking, Storage, Cybersecurity Specialty.
       #2

    Hi.

    Are you connecting one drive at a time to test performance?
    In other words, you have W10 on each SSD as a boot drive and you are plugging one in, testing, then powering down, unplugging and switching to the other drive?

    If this is the case, the Samsung should be the drive with the best performance - if the correct Samsung drivers are PCI-e 4. The Samsung is working great to me!

    Try Atto's free tool:

    Disk Benchmark for Windows Software | ATTO

    This is also a very interesting site to test and compare:

    SSD UserBenchmarks - 1058 Solid State Drives Compared

    Please post back with your findings.

    Last edited by Compumind; 23 Feb 2022 at 17:30.
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 18,432
    Windows 11 Pro
       #3

    How many times did you run the test?
      My Computer


  4. gil
    Posts : 193
    Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64-bit 10586 Multiprocessor Free
    Thread Starter
       #4

    Compumind said:
    Hi.

    Are you connecting one drive at a time to test performance?
    In other words, you have W10 on each SSD as a boot drive and you are plugging one in, testing, then powering down, unplugging and switching to the other drive?

    If this is the case, the Samsung should be the drive with the best performance - if the correct Samsung drivers are PCI-e 4. The Samsung is working great to me!

    Try Atto's free tool:

    Disk Benchmark for Windows Software | ATTO

    This is also a very interesting site to test and compare:

    SSD UserBenchmarks - 1058 Solid State Drives Compared

    Please post back with your findings.

    windows 11 runs on the Samsung pro drive. th crucial SSD runs on the same system.
    they are both connected to the same PC. Samsung is C: drive and Crucial is H: drive.

    And Samsung is connected to the slot that supports pcie gen 4 but it also is a certified gen 4 SSD drive.

    - - - Updated - - -

    NavyLCDR said:
    How many times did you run the test?
    one
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 18,432
    Windows 11 Pro
       #5

    NavyLCDR said:
    How many times did you run the test?

    gil said:
    one
    Do you think it is possible the result was a fluke? Something else accessed the disk at the same time and threw off the result?
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 18,044
    Win 10 Pro 64-bit v1909 - Build 18363 Custom ISO Install
       #6

    @NavyLCDR,

    Sorry to jump in here.

    I have been working on a project for the collation of Computer and OS data, and have generated a couple of Commands that I think you might find useful for getting user information from members that are having a problem.

    Code:
    
    PowerShell "$AAA=Get-Partition | Where-Object {$_.IsSystem -eq 'True'} | Select DiskNumber -ExpandProperty DiskNumber;" ^
               "$BBB=Get-Partition | Where-Object {$_.IsSystem -eq 'True'} | Select PartitionNumber -ExpandProperty PartitionNumber; Write-Host 'System Disk and Partition : Disk' $AAA 'Partition' $BBB"
    PowerShell "$AAA=Get-Partition | Where-Object {$_.IsSystem -eq 'True'} | Select DiskNumber -ExpandProperty DiskNumber;" ^
               "$BBB=Get-Partition | Where-Object {$_.IsBoot   -eq 'True'} | Select PartitionNumber -ExpandProperty PartitionNumber; Write-Host 'Boot Disk and Partition   : Disk' $AAA 'Partition' $BBB"
    PowerShell "$AAA=(Get-wmiObject Win32_OperatingSystem | "^
               "Select @{L='LastBootupTime';E={$_.ConvertToDateTime($_.LastBootupTime)}} | Select -ExpandProperty LastBootupTime).ToString(); Write-Host 'Last Bootup Date and Time :' $AAA"
    
    System Disk and Partition : Disk 0 Partition 1
    Boot Disk and Partition   : Disk 0 Partition 2
    Last Bootup Date and Time : 14/02/2022 13:44:36
    
    
    
    
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 2,068
    Windows 10 Pro
       #7

    Comparing the numbers to what I find on the web for a 980Pro, it seems that your 4k numbers are in the right ballpark. Honestly, it seems that your Crucial numbers are higher than they should be.

    I would suggest getting the latest versions of Crystaldisk. I think 8.x is the latest and you are on 5.x.
      My Computers


  8. Posts : 5,048
    Windows 10/11 Pro x64, Various Linux Builds, Networking, Storage, Cybersecurity Specialty.
       #8

    @gil -

    You need to use a few nice tools to get an average result.

    The way I do it is very simple. The SSD is the boot drive. The other is an HDD or an SSD.
    Do a large block file transfer of 50 GB - simple copy and paste - you will see the throughput.

      My Computer


 

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 10 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 10" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 13:41.
Find Us




Windows 10 Forums