New
#1901
2017 Hardware Thread
-
-
New #1902
Hope it will be able to load up Ryzen properly so true performance could be evaluated. Most of today's benchmarks, even when they boost processor to 100% stil will not make it go to XFR boost, in case of my 1600x it should go to 4100MHz but rarely any push it that far. PT is an example of it, with full load and at or close to 100% load on all cores it doesn't even approach rated boost at 4100MHz, mostly stays at up to 3900MHz and scores suffer.
-
New #1903
Futuremark(like 3DMark(Timespy and so on)
SystemInfo Version 5.1
Updated June 5, 2017
- Updated CPUID module for improved hardware detection.
- Updated GPU detection module to fix several known compatibility issues and to improve compatibility with the latest GPUs.
- Known issue: Ryzen CPUs will still show clock speed as '-1' in 3DMark and VRMark until next benchmark update due to Ryzen CPUs not having a "stock clock" value for CPUID to read.
-
New #1904
So I was right, benchmarks still don't know how to handle Ryzen and it's many stage of boost.
-
-
-
New #1907
Been subscribed to https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHX...Y3xNOmzr5O3zgA for some time now and he is alway for th emost part spot on.
His latest video:
-
-
-
New #1909
I laugh at the notion that people really think Intel is doomed by AMD. Heard the same thing when people were opinionating that Microsoft was "doomed" when Windows 10 hit. Linux was supposed to be taking over the world. How'd that work out
Anyway Intel isn't losing ground to anything, despite a perceived AMD boost.
-
Related Discussions
