Overclocking the Z590 Motherboards

OldMike65 said:

Your a Pro at this Doug ....I'm still green LoL

We are all green with new hardware. Constantly learning new stuff

Dude said:

We are all green with new hardware. Constantly learning new stuff

I meant with me setting up this new thread ....not about our new hardware.

We were all using your Cinebench thread and it didn't seem right ....

OldMike65 said:

I meant with me setting up this new thread ....not about our new hardware.

We were all using your Cinebench thread and it didn't seem right ....

It's fine, the thread is open to discussions too.

Speaking of Z590, check this bad boy out

EVGA Z590 Dark Motherboard Is Supposedly Coming Soon | Tom's Hardware

Dude said:

Speaking of Z590, check this bad boy out

EVGA Z590 Dark Motherboard Is Supposedly Coming Soon | Tom's Hardware

@Dude
Got a question for you Doug ....I'm always seeing this screen .....is this normal on your Cinebench thread??

Yes, it will show that until a thread is marked solved

Dude said:

Yes, it will show that until a thread is marked solved

So you see this on your Cinebench thread everytime you post??

Yes

Going to post some screenshots I found recently on one persons tweaking his Z590 board.

ThrashZone said:

Hi,
Might as well drop this read off rog forum should apply to z590 as well
Cleaned up a bit he used some weird symbol that messed it up

I want to point out a mistake in Shamino's posting that screwed me up a bit:

"So why dont we set DC LL to 0.01 and AC LL to whatever we need (since the actual vdroop compensation cpu
requests for boils down to AC LL Value)?
Well you can but when AC and DC LL values differ, the current and power calculations done by the cpu gets
skewed."

Instead of "but when AC and DC LL values differ", it should be "When LLC and DC LL differ". To get accurate power readings from the processor, you should have the DCLL set to the LLC (in mohms).
For instance, LLC5 is a loadline of about .79 mohm, so if you are using LLC5 you would want DCLL = 0.79, otherwise the power measurements would be off (and the power the CPU uses to determine whether to throttle or not). This has a side effect of reducing the VID displayed in monitoring, but not the actual VID sent to the VRM. The CPU power estimate that comes from the EC chip on the other hand is always correct.