Radeon VII

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

  1. Posts : 5,899
    Win 11 Pro (x64) 22H2
       #1

    Radeon VII


    Today my Radeon VII came in from AMD....

    Radeon VII-r7-2.jpg
    Radeon VII-r7-installed2.jpg
    Radeon VII-r7-installed.jpg

    After a driver sweep and install, I got this for my first Fire Strike straight score out the box. No tweaks or OC's (yet) 😊

    Radeon VII-r7-first-run.png

    AMD Radeon VII video card benchmark result - Intel Core i9-9900K Processor, Gigabyte Z390 AORUS XTREME-CF

    System specs....
    • Case - Master Case H500M
    • MB - Gigabyte Z390 Extreme
    • CPU - Intel i9-9900K
    • RAM - 32gig Corsair DDR4 Dominator Platinum RAM (3333MHz)
    • CPU Cooler - Corsair AIO CPU cooler – H115i Pro
    • Drives - 5 Samsung SSD drives: 2x 512gig 970 NVMe drive (OS & Photos drive), 1 x 1TB 850 EVO (Acronis backups), 1x 1TB 860 EVO (music), and 1x 2TB 850 EVO (Games, data).
    • Graphics card - AMD Radeon VII
    • Sound - On-board (ESS Sabre HiFi using Realtek drivers)
    • Power Supply - EVGA Super Nova I000 P2 (1000 watt)
    • OS - Windows 10 Pro x64 (1809)
      My Computers


  2. Posts : 16,637
    Windows 11 Pro X64
       #2

    Congrats on the new GPU
      My Computers


  3. Posts : 950
    Windows 10 Pro
       #3

    Looks good mate. Matches the rest of your build really well
      My Computers


  4. Posts : 5,899
    Win 11 Pro (x64) 22H2
    Thread Starter
       #4

    Thanks. I think it looks nice as well.

    Still trying to get things sorted while navigating a class. System runs good but I haven't had time to pushed it yet.
      My Computers


  5. Posts : 12,801
    Windows 11 Pro
       #5

    @sygnus21 You did your usual great job of building a great looking computer with great specs. Very well done, my friend.
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 246
    Win 11 Pro
       #6

    Nice and clean build. Congrats.
      My Computers


  7. Posts : 5,899
    Win 11 Pro (x64) 22H2
    Thread Starter
       #7

    essenbe said:
    @sygnus21 You did your usual great job of building a great looking computer with great specs. Very well done, my friend.
    Thanks. I always wanted to build a system like this and I'm happy I did. I was going to buy a new camera for my birthday. I bought this instead :)

    Oh, here's the system before the new card...
    Radeon VII-cm500m.jpg

    @Brawndo, Thanks
      My Computers


  8. Posts : 27,181
    Win11 Pro, Win10 Pro N, Win10 Home, Windows 8.1 Pro, Ubuntu
       #8

    CongratZ @sygnus21

    And MSI Afterburner was updated just in time for you, with RVII support.

    Latest MSI Afterburner Betas Updates - Page 25 - Windows 10 Forums

    ** A few important notes for RADEON VII owners:


    • Core voltage slider in MSI AB is supposed to be locked on RVII, that’s normal and by design. On the previous AMD GPUs the slider provided direct voltage control mode implemented via low-level access to SMC or voltage controller (slider position defined either full target voltage override or P-State independent voltage offset) and such voltage adjustment form was required because native AMD driver’s voltage adjustment range was too low. On RVII series cards AMD driver allows up to 1.2V overvoltage (from default 1V) and voltage control is provided in MSI AB at voltage/frequency curve editor level. So simply open the editor (either press VF editor button in the skin next to core clock slider or hit <Ctrl>+<F>keyboard shortcut to open the editor) and you’ll be able to adjust voltage there.
    • Temperature limit slider is also supposed to be locked by design on RVII, it was a part of old AMD fan control algorithm. It is gone with Adrenalin 2019 drivers family when fan curve adjustment approach was introduced by AMD. So it is no longer adjustable in AMD driver and supposed to be locked now.
    • Voltage/frequency editor is allowing you to adjust frequencies and voltages independently for all 3 V/F curve points (or 3 P-States), however AMD driver and RVII architecture put some restrictions on the curve editing approach. So the curve will be corrected according to the following limitations when you apply it:
      • You can adjust the frequency independently for the first and the last point only. Middle point frequency cannot be adjusted independently, frequencies are always linearly interpolated from the first point to the last point. So if you try to adjust frequency for the middle point, it will be corrected according to interpolation rule mentioned above right after applying new settings
      • Unlike the frequencies, you can independently adjust voltages for all 3 points
      • You cannot set frequencies and voltages below the minimum (which is rather strict and very close to default). This puts some limitations on lower P-State downclocking/downvolting
      • 2 GPU temperatures displayed by MSI AB hardware monitoring module are mapped to edge and junction temperatures. 4 displayed VRM temperatures are mapped to core VRM, SOC VRM and 2 memory VRM sensors. AMD’s fan curve is using junction temperature for their fan speed adjustment. I’m not sure if it is really good idea because it is skyrocketing to 100C area pretty rapidly when GPU is busy, that’s actually direct reason why RVII cooling is so loud by default. Opposing to that, MSI AB’s software fan curve implementation is still using traditional edge temperature sensor. Probably I’ll add an ability to select input thermal sensor for software fan curve adjustment in future versions, but honestly I’m not sure if it worth the efforts
      • Currently AMD's own GPU usage sensor is suffering from pretty bad 0%->100%->0% fluctuations. Similar issues affected some old GPUs in the past but it is much worse on RVII now. I believe that it is what they mean with "Performance metrics overlay and Radeon WattMan gauges may experience inaccurate fluctuating readings on AMD Radeon VII" in the driver's known issues, so there is a hope to see a fix from AMD in future. I remind you that it is possible to get rid of such fluctuations via enabling unified GPU usage monitoring in MSI AB properties, however this option depends on DirectX GPU usage performance counter and this counter requires OS and display driver WDDM versions to match. Current AMD drivers are targeted to WDDM 2.5 OS (October Update), so this option will only help you if you have 1809 OS version installed. Otherwise you'll see zero GPU usage all the time after enabling it.

      My Computers


  9. Posts : 12,801
    Windows 11 Pro
       #9

    sygnus21 said:
    Thanks. I always wanted to build a system like this and I'm happy I did. I was going to buy a new camera for my birthday. I bought this instead :)

    Oh, here's the system before the new card...

    Drew, that's a nice looking case. Isn't it supposedly built as the successor to the HAF cases? I seem to remember a few reviews of it when it was first released. It sort of looks tempting.
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 5,899
    Win 11 Pro (x64) 22H2
    Thread Starter
       #10

    essenbe said:
    Drew, that's a nice looking case. Isn't it supposedly built as the successor to the HAF cases? I seem to remember a few reviews of it when it was first released. It sort of looks tempting.
    It's trying to replace the HAF X, but I don't think it succeeds. Anyway it's the last in a number of "H500" revisions that fix issues of previous versions. This is the "Master Case H500M". It's a beautiful case with tempered glass on 4 sides - top, sides, and front (in place of mesh panel). I'm using the mesh panel for max air flow.

    it has some shortcomings where an E-ATX board and AIO's with 280mm radiators are concerned. Only had the case a day before I ended up modding (cutting) the top fan brace so I could sit the radiator on top of the brace and the fans on the bottom (exhausting air out top through radiator). If I try to fit both rad and fan inside case at top the fans would hit the board's cooling block. The case needs to be about 2 inches taller. And cable Management isn't as easy as touted unless you just want to use the cable panels to hid a mass of cables.

    In the end I was able to work things out and my EATX board fit well, but I can see some configurations not being so easy. Overall I like the case, but knowing what I know now, I might have kept the HAF X longer. It can't beat the 500M for looks though. You can see my post here for more photos of the case - Cooler Master H500M Case

    @ Cliff S, thanks for the info. Saw that at overclock.net as well.
      My Computers


 

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 10 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 10" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 23:27.
Find Us




Windows 10 Forums