2018 Hardware Thread


  1. Posts : 19,207
    W11+W11 Developer Insider + Linux
       #681

    essenbe said:
    Mike, you ran a little different sample than I did, but I have no idea what/if any, difference it makes. The transfer size is different.
    I just run it at what defaults were, I'll try to match your settings next.
    PS.
    Ah, I cant run with more than 64MB because you were testing your second drive which is 500GB, mine is only 250GB.
      My Computers


  2. Posts : 12,724
    Windows 11 Pro
       #682

    This is my C drive

    2018 Hardware Thread-zzz.jpg
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 19,207
    W11+W11 Developer Insider + Linux
       #683

    Could be different version, my is v3.5 ???
      My Computers


  4. Posts : 478
    Windows 11 Pro/ POP_OS 22.04 LTS
       #684

    Applied Thermal paste in the Dell because the temps seemed off and they were. The factory thermal paste covered the whole CPU and glued it to the heatsink so when I pulled it out the CPU came out with it. Thankfully no pins were bent. 62c for a whole hour of blender. The stock thermal paste was total crap.
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 1,191
    Windows 11 Pro x64
       #685

    Polo6RGTI said:
    New Samsung NVMe Driver 3.0 is available. I have tested it and found the write performance to be lower than that of the 2.3 driver. I have reverted back to the 2.3 driver.
    Better by a margin for me over 2.3 driver on 960 pro. YMMV I guess.
      My Computers


  6. Posts : 19,207
    W11+W11 Developer Insider + Linux
       #686

    When doing benchmarks, are you guys monitoring frequencies and core(s) usage per core ?
    I can't get CB15 and Performance test (just 2 examples) to push any cores to go as far as processor would allow in Turbo + power saving mode. If I leave everything on Auto and run those benchmarks it never boost to projected frequency (4.25 - 4.35GHz on this processor). Actually it doesn't even reach 4.225GHz that I can easily achieve by manual OC (100% stability). When manually OCed. all cores do stay at that frequency (of course) but I have a feeling that cores are not used to full potential and scores are not what they should be.
      My Computers


  7. Posts : 1,096
    win 10
       #687

    Geneo said:
    Better by a margin for me over 2.3 driver on 960 pro. YMMV I guess.
    Better for me on my 950 as well. Not that you will ever notice the difference in windows but at least not a step backwards. :)
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 2,976
    Windows 11
       #688

    What's performance looking like with Win 10 1803? I've installed it and my favorite game seems a bit worse.
      My Computer


  9. Posts : 19,207
    W11+W11 Developer Insider + Linux
       #689

    Kol12 said:
    What's performance looking like with Win 10 1803? I've installed it and my favorite game seems a bit worse.
    Shouldn't have anything to do with game performance. Changes if any are not enough to notice anywhere except maybe some benchmarks.
      My Computers


  10. Posts : 2,976
    Windows 11
       #690

    CountMike said:
    Shouldn't have anything to do with game performance. Changes if any are not enough to notice anywhere except maybe some benchmarks.
    Hmm, maybe it is some misconfiguration then.
      My Computer


 

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 10 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 10" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:45.
Find Us




Windows 10 Forums