New
#11
The only problem is that he is griping over something that IBM implemented in 1976, not Microsoft. https://www.linuxjournal.com/content...fi-secure-boot
https://www.uefi.org/sites/default/f...tions_2013.pdf
The whole reasoning by the author of Rufus is that if something happens and the machine is in Secure Boot mode, he believes that people would hold him liable for their mistake, which is the case with our society. If people want more features and better abilities in software that is offered for free, they need to start helping out the developer by supporting them and those that also place their work under FSF.
Last edited by bro67; 28 Dec 2018 at 12:06.