Have anyone tried this HDMI cable ?

Steve C said:

Why do you think DisplayPort is better?

Because Display port 1.4 can handle higher bandwidth and has always been the primary choice from a gaming perspective. Sure not everyone is a gamer but i am basing my map on gaming as its the basis system i use generally when comparing things and because i game. Regardless it does not really matter outside of this but still DP is better than HDMI just from a raw throughput sense. DP 1.4a has better HDR support which is big in games now.

HDMI 2.1 but most people won't have that yet because its new. going to be 10k resolution with 48gpbs throughput.

Display port 2.0 will be here soon too so it will be Display port wins again eventually. going to be 16k resolution with 80gbps throughput.

DP has always been the better cable.

Got my Atzebe fibre optic hdmi cable. After fixed it up, i actually get more, healthy and nicer
view from this pure and interference free cable. I posted snapshots, top is before and bottom is after. Not sure if anyone can see the difference as i do.

I agree the snapshots taken is not the same compare to looking at my monitor and also different when uploaded and view on other monitors. So far things i brought and shared have positive reviews from other buyers, not just me alone.
I understand that everyone has it's personal capital and capability when come to purchasing and judgement.

I saved the two image files and ran them thru an image compare program.
They are IDENTICAL except for the clock display area in the lower right corner.
The same, pixel by pixel. No difference.
So your cable makes no difference.
It may make you 'feel' better.
But the screen display is the same.

In case you are interested, I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale. Let me know if you are interested.

AK6DN said:

In case you are interested, I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale. Let me know if you are interested.

Ahhhh.... but big question is: Is the bridge for sale in Brooklyn shielded from EMF interference? If it isn't then @sportster will not be interested.

Edit: I just realized EMI interference is repetitive!

@sportser is the only guy I know that probably has a $10,000 computer system. $2,000 in hardware, and $8,000 in EMF shielded case and cables.

AK6DN said:

I saved the two image files and ran them thru an image compare program.
They are IDENTICAL except for the clock display area in the lower right corner.
The same, pixel by pixel. No difference.
So your cable makes no difference.
It may make you 'feel' better.
But the screen display is the same.

In case you are interested, I have a bridge in Brooklyn for sale. Let me know if you are interested.

The improved video spectrum can only be notice on my screen. Just like improvement from optical over coaxial over analog
audio connection. And snapshot of my current game has difference result from desktop image.

NavyLCDR said:

Ahhhh.... but big question is: Is the bridge for sale in Brooklyn shielded from EMF interference? If it isn't then @sportster will not be interested.

Edit: I just realized EMI interference is repetitive!

NavyLCDR said:

@sportser is the only guy I know that probably has a $10,000 computer system. $2,000 in hardware, and $8,000 in EMF shielded case and cables.

I'm not rich and my computer is only about us$2500. Fibre optic HDMI cable is only about us$30. EMI/RF ferrite magnet
core is about us$15 for 60 pieces. For healthy computing.

Steve C said:

Let's keep this funny thread going. What is the EMI/RF ferrite magnet core for whatever that is?

Read the link at bottom for product descriptions and look at customers reviews.

https://www.aliexpress.com/item/3282...a52ef19cFZS50g