Old digital camera photos do not retain original EXIF data when copied

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

  1. Posts : 5,048
    Windows 10/11 Pro x64, Various Linux Builds, Networking, Storage, Cybersecurity Specialty.
    Thread Starter
       #21

    Hmm...

    This is not good. EXIF data should be read-only, unless you have a specific program to manipulate it.
    I will now have to mark all image/video files as Read-Only when I download them from the camera.

    I think that this might be a bug in Windows with regard to EXIF data tagging in a single file.
    Have to do some research on this.

      My Computer


  2. Posts : 2,191
    Windows 10 Pro 64-bit v22H2
       #22

    Compumind said:
    Hmm...

    This is not good. EXIF data should be read-only, unless you have a specific program to manipulate it.
    I will now have to mark all image/video files as Read-Only when I download them from the camera.

    I think that this might be a bug in Windows with regard to EXIF data tagging in a single file.
    Have to do some research on this.

    I have some good news. I hooked up my phone to my laptop with a USB cable. I then copied over the same photo again to my desktop. I renamed this 20221116_211205d.jpg. This copy retained the same Exif date taken and size as the original.

    I would like to repeat that with File Explorer the original date and time are retained for all photos in the Date and Date taken columns. It is strange even when it seems the Exif date and time have been changed.

    Old digital camera photos do not retain original EXIF data when copied-screenshot3.jpg

    For me the problem is with the Phone Link app. If I use it to drag and drop a photo to my desktop the Exif date and size are changed. I will continue to use the Phone Link app but for most purposes but will have to remember its limitations.
      My Computers


  3. Posts : 526
    Windows 10
       #23

    I checked drag and drop from phone to PC using Samsung´s DeX. The EXIF info and the photo size are preserved in the transfer.

    DeX is used to operated the phone wirelessly from the PC screen. It does not require an MS account, but only works in S and Z series phones.
      My Computer


  4. Posts : 2,191
    Windows 10 Pro 64-bit v22H2
       #24

    Anibor said:
    I checked drag and drop from phone to PC using Samsung´s DeX. The EXIF info and the photo size are preserved in the transfer.

    DeX is used to operated the phone wirelessly from the PC screen. It does not require an MS account, but only works in S and Z series phones.
    DeX works fine with my Samsung S21. However, during the initial setup I am required to hook up the phone to my PC with a USB cable. To continue I am requires my to disable Link to Windows on my phone. Phone Link on Windows requires Link to Windows on the phone. I could restart Link to Windows after DeX is running so that Phone Link works again. This way both programs can work at the same time.

    That is too much bother because I would have to go through all this every time I started my computer. Since I find Phone Link more useful I uninstalled Dex.
      My Computers


  5. Posts : 5,048
    Windows 10/11 Pro x64, Various Linux Builds, Networking, Storage, Cybersecurity Specialty.
    Thread Starter
       #25

    Hi.

    It must be something in the Canon SD-600 software.

    When I use my iPhone and do the manipulations with File Explorer, everything is just fine.

    I'm done.

    Thanks, all!

      My Computer


  6. Posts : 1,680
    X
       #26

    This ...
    MisterEd said:
    The Exif data is embedded in the image file itself. It can only be changed by a program that can modify this data. It is impossible for a simple thing like copying the image file to change the Exif data.
    I think you're looking at a date field (which is "owned" by Windows), rather than the date-taken field (which is part of the image file's EXIF data).
      My Computer


  7. Posts : 2,191
    Windows 10 Pro 64-bit v22H2
       #27

    margrave55 said:
    This ...


    I think you're looking at a date field (which is "owned" by Windows), rather than the date-taken field (which is part of the image file's EXIF data).
    You are right. The program I used was supposed to be extracting the EXIF data. I rechecked these photos with an online program and found that the original program I used may have gotten the date wrong. It seems the EXIF date may not have been changed on any of the photos I had. I will have to research this further and see if I need to find another offline EXIF viewer program.
      My Computers


  8. Posts : 1,775
    Windows 10 Pro
       #28

    MisterEd said:
    You are right. The program I used was supposed to be extracting the EXIF data. I rechecked these photos with an online program and found that the original program I used may have gotten the date wrong.
    Not surprising, since EXIF metadata is not well understood by most people.
    It seems the EXIF date may not have been changed on any of the photos I had. I will have to research this further and see if I need to find another offline EXIF viewer program.
    As I mentioned earlier, look at EXIFToolGUI, which is exactly what it does for command-line EXIFTool.
      My Computers


  9. Posts : 2,191
    Windows 10 Pro 64-bit v22H2
       #29

    x509 said:
    Not surprising, since EXIF metadata is not well understood by most people.


    As I mentioned earlier, look at EXIFToolGUI, which is exactly what it does for command-line EXIFTool.
    Thanks. That works a lot better.
      My Computers


 

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 10 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 10" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:55.
Find Us




Windows 10 Forums