Persistent BSOD ntoskrnl.exe

Page 4 of 16 FirstFirst ... 2345614 ... LastLast

  1. Posts : 41,475
    windows 10 professional version 1607 build 14393.969 64 bit
       #31

    At this time having more dump files and evaluating the RAM/DIMM/MB are indicated.
      My Computer


  2. Posts : 90
    Windows 10 Pro 64-bit - Build 17134
    Thread Starter
       #32

    Was just poking around and I noticed Google Back Up and Sync (which I don't actually use) was updated around about the time of my latest BSOD. After some brief research I found this. I realize that the thread is a bit bereft of actual troubleshooting but I figured what the hell and uninstalled Google Back Up and Sync
      My Computer


  3. Posts : 5,169
    64bit Win 10 Pro ver 21H2
       #33

    zbook said:
    philc43 may have more suggestions.
    I have now had a look at the last crash dump you provided for us. This is quite interesting, there were actually two bugchecks as far as I can tell and the one reported in the dump was happening on processor #9. Below is the stack at the time of the crash:
    Code:
    9: kd> kV
     # Child-SP          RetAddr           : Args to Child                                                           : Call Site
    00 ffffdf8e`ad098498 fffff803`cdadaa8a : 00000000`0000001e ffffffff`c000001d fffff807`2b8b2982 ffffa680`54b28800 : nt!KeBugCheckEx
    01 ffffdf8e`ad0984a0 fffff803`cda2fd0d : fffff803`cdc8c000 fffff803`cd88f000 0005961c`00961000 ffffdf8e`ad0987d0 : nt!KiFatalExceptionHandler+0x22
    02 ffffdf8e`ad0984e0 fffff803`cd8e6b06 : ffffdf8e`ad098610 ffffdf8e`ad098ad0 00000000`00000000 ffffdf8e`ad0993e8 : nt!RtlpExecuteHandlerForException+0xd
    03 ffffdf8e`ad098510 fffff803`cd8e7f23 : ffffdf8e`ad0993e8 ffffdf8e`ad099130 ffffdf8e`ad0993e8 ffffcf01`8c019ab0 : nt!RtlDispatchException+0x416
    04 ffffdf8e`ad098c00 fffff803`cda38042 : 00000000`006100bc fffff807`30c55ebf 00000000`00000000 ffffdf8e`ad099400 : nt!KiDispatchException+0x1f3
    05 ffffdf8e`ad0992b0 fffff803`cda331a5 : fffff780`00000008 00000000`00000000 ffffcf01`8ea38780 ffffcf01`8cd1f970 : nt!KiExceptionDispatch+0xc2
    06 ffffdf8e`ad099490 fffff807`2b8b2982 : 0000001f`b3ae2d48 00000000`00cfc380 ffffcf01`8c325e58 00000000`00000029 : nt!KiInvalidOpcodeFault+0x2e5 (TrapFrame @ ffffdf8e`ad099490)
    07 ffffdf8e`ad099620 fffff803`cd929017 : ffffa680`54b1af80 ffffdf8e`ad099a10 ffffcf01`8c325f10 ffffa680`54b18180 : tcpip!TcpPeriodicTimeoutHandler+0x532
    08 ffffdf8e`ad099910 fffff803`cd92866b : 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 : nt!KiExecuteAllDpcs+0x2e7
    09 ffffdf8e`ad099a50 fffff803`cda2ab8a : ffffffff`00000000 ffffa680`54b18180 00000000`00000000 ffffa680`54b28800 : nt!KiRetireDpcList+0x1db
    0a ffffdf8e`ad099c60 00000000`00000000 : ffffdf8e`ad09a000 ffffdf8e`ad094000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 : nt!KiIdleLoop+0x5a
    The bug check was:
    Code:
    KMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED (1e)
    This is a very common bugcheck.  Usually the exception address pinpoints
    the driver/function that caused the problem.  Always note this address
    as well as the link date of the driver/image that contains this address.
    Arguments:
    Arg1: ffffffffc000001d, The exception code that was not handled
    Arg2: fffff8072b8b2982, The address that the exception occurred at
    Arg3: ffffa68054b28800, Parameter 0 of the exception
    Arg4: ffffcf018c019970, Parameter 1 of the exception
    EXCEPTION_CODE: (NTSTATUS) 0xc000001d - {EXCEPTION} Illegal Instruction An attempt was made to execute an illegal instruction.

    FAILURE_BUCKET_ID: 0x1E_c000001d_BAD_IP_tcpip!TcpPeriodicTimeoutHandler

    Which is why tcpip.sys was blamed but as it's a windows driver it is unlikely to be the problem.


    However, you can also check the other processor cores on the CPU and while most of them were idle, #8 was also having a problem as you can see by switching to it in the crash dump:
    Code:
    9: kd> ~8
    8: kd> kV
     # Child-SP          RetAddr           : Args to Child                                                           : Call Site
    00 ffffa680`54a903d8 fffff803`cd8424ce : 00000000`00000080 00000000`004f4454 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 : nt!KeBugCheckEx
    01 ffffa680`54a903e0 fffff807`2a6a14ba : ffffcf01`8c226968 fffff803`cd865270 00000000`00000000 fffff803`cd865270 : hal!HalBugCheckSystem+0x7e
    02 ffffa680`54a90420 fffff803`cdb57ff1 : ffffcf01`8c226968 00000000`00000000 fffff803`cd865270 00000000`00000000 : PSHED!PshedBugCheckSystem+0xa
    03 ffffa680`54a90450 fffff803`cd84487e : 00000000`000006c0 00000000`00000010 ffffa680`54a90530 fffff803`cdae5504 : nt!WheaReportHwError+0x261
    04 ffffa680`54a904b0 fffff803`cdadb26e : 00000000`00000001 00000000`00000000 00000000`0000000f fffff803`cdae5590 : hal!HalHandleNMI+0xfe
    05 ffffa680`54a904e0 fffff803`cda32382 : ffffa680`54a80180 ffffa680`54a906f0 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 : nt!KiProcessNMI+0x11e
    06 ffffa680`54a90530 fffff803`cda32168 : 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 : nt!KxNmiInterrupt+0x82
    07 ffffa680`54a90670 fffff803`cdae0c7e : 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 : nt!KiNmiInterrupt+0x1e8 (TrapFrame @ ffffa680`54a90670)
    08 ffffdf8e`ad089bd0 00000000`00000000 : 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 : nt!KiCheckStall+0x6e

    The bugcheck was 0x80 which is a NMI_HARDWARE_FAILURE. (NMI = Non-Maskable Interrupt)
    A variety of hardware malfunctions can cause the NMI_HARDWARE_FAILURE bug check. The exact cause is difficult to determine.


    I have never seen two bugchecks in one dump before but thought I would highlight it in case someone else can throw some light on what might have happened.
    Last edited by philc43; 31 Jul 2018 at 11:45.
      My Computers


  4. Posts : 90
    Windows 10 Pro 64-bit - Build 17134
    Thread Starter
       #34

    Thanks for looking into this further and that is interesting. A bit of background. About two weeks ago in preparation to OC my 1950x, I decided I needed to reapply Arctic Silver to get better temps from my Liqtech 360. To make a long story short I made quite the mess of things by not taking out the processor to clean it and ended up getting Arctic Silver thermal compound as well as 2-step solution into the processor socket.

    Feast your eyes:
    Attachment 197878
    Attachment 197879

    I replaced the motherboard with the exact same motherboard and BIOS version, was able to clean the underside of the processor with Arctic Silver 2-step solution and am using it now. I cleaned the processor as gently as I could and believe I got all of the material off the underside of it. I even contacted and shared this info with AMD and they told me to go ahead and use the processor which I am now. However now I'm wondering if my cleaning wasn't as successful as I'd hoped... Thoughts?
      My Computer


  5. Posts : 90
    Windows 10 Pro 64-bit - Build 17134
    Thread Starter
       #35

    Also one more thing. Could Google Backup and Sync possibly be the culprit? I ask because after uninstalling it yesterday afternoon I haven't had any BSODs...(knock on wood).
      My Computer


  6. Posts : 5,169
    64bit Win 10 Pro ver 21H2
       #36

    RyanTScott said:
    Also one more thing. Could Google Backup and Sync possibly be the culprit? I ask because after uninstalling it yesterday afternoon I haven't had any BSODs...(knock on wood).
    See how it goes, it could have contributed. Remember how I said at the outset (post #8) that I felt there could be multiple causes for your history of BSODs. We are narrowing them down bit by bit. The CPU contamination could be significant too. You can always run a CPU stress test if you want to check it out more thoroughly.

     CPU TEST

    Run Prime95 to stress test your CPU. Prime95 - Stress Test Your CPU - Windows 10 Forums

    warning   Warning
    Your CPU temperatures will rise quickly while under this stress test. Keep a keen eye on them and abort the test if overheating occurs.
      My Computers


  7. Posts : 90
    Windows 10 Pro 64-bit - Build 17134
    Thread Starter
       #37

    How long would you recommend I run Prime?
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 5,169
    64bit Win 10 Pro ver 21H2
       #38

    About two weeks ago in preparation to OC my 1950x, I decided I needed to reapply Arctic Silver to get better temps from my Liqtech 360.

    If you are overclocking I would prefer that you removed this while we are testing.

    How long would you recommend I run Prime?
    If your temperatures are stable run for about 30mins to see if there are any problems, if no problems you can run it for up to 3 hours for longer testing.
      My Computers


  9. Posts : 90
    Windows 10 Pro 64-bit - Build 17134
    Thread Starter
       #39

    Ok understood, thanks Phil. Everything is at stock since I replaced the motherboard and I'll run Prime in a bit.
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 90
    Windows 10 Pro 64-bit - Build 17134
    Thread Starter
       #40

    I changed my mind on running Prime right now as I'm in the middle of a project... I'll begin testing with it on Friday evening and in the meantime will continue to report BSODs as previously instructed. Again I can't thank you both enough.
      My Computer


 

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 10 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 10" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

© Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:11.
Find Us




Windows 10 Forums