29 points is well within the margin of error.....even up to a couple hundred points.
The CPU score takes memory clock/timings, cache and core frequency into account. Motherboard can also play a part, as well as stability of the overclock.
Thanks, Vellinious and Cliff and as always Dude for maintaining and updating these scores.
Back to gaming for me.
I ran Time Spy again. This time I used a curve on the GPU OC. The highest curve I could achieve without crashing was giving me about the same graphic score as before. This run (curve) gave me a 2101 core clock but I've seen that with an offset. So I increased the GPU memory from 500 to 550, as Vellinious mentioned to Cliff. That increased my graphic score to 8303.
But in these runs with the exact same CPU OC as I had before, my CPU score is down, now 29 points below Cliff's 4.9 OC. That makes sense to me, but why my CPU score went down doesn't..
I think I will give up trying to figure it out.
Dude; new Time Spy score 7790.
Attachment 126960
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-6700K,ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. MAXIMUS VIII FORMULABoard updated
Last edited by Dude; 10 Feb 2018 at 14:54.
Creator update to 15063.13, video drivers to 381.65 not approved yet. Finally broke 8000 on graphics. CPU 4.6, VID +235, MEM +500 on A/B
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/1513589
A small Bump(gaming mode off):
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-6700K,MSI Z170A PC MATE (MS-7971)
Quote
Mosfet & chipset are also only passive cooled.
