Time Spy - DirectX 12 benchmark test

essenbe said:

@specialkone, let me see if I understand what you are saying. It sounds like you are saying that @worf105's CPU is lazy and would be a good match for @Dude's lazy 1070. Am I close?

I don't think Worf's I7 6700k delided CPU is lazy. It's working hard even according to his CPU score numbers. Simply not a match, benchmark score wise, for that Zotac 1080 TI. Seems he would need 8 cores to keep up with Nessie's benchmark scores.

Dude's lazy 1070, well I still can't figure out how it stays in the 40"s C under load. It's avoiding work, obviously, but still makes me think it needs to be reseated. Doesn't seem to be getting enough voltage, certainly not enough voltage/performance to "light up" Lidia and Red.

Dude said:

I have Lydia and Raquel doing whatever I want now

Really? A picture tells a thousand words. That's Lidia and Red eating out of your hand? As I said, looks to me like you just told them about your 7001 Time Spy score.



If cool under pressure means taking 3 months to hit 7001, I'd rather have a 1080 that tops that easily at 68C.

Dude said:

No, that was them reading you post, I wont post spoilers of our orgy

essenbe said:

Tommy, you have 2 more cores than Worf. Of course he can overclock higher than you. You already beat his highest CPU score, as you should. I don't believe it is possible, short of LN2, for him to overclock high enough to match your CPU score.

One is running 4.5 the other 6700K 4.7 if i was able to crank it up to 5 ghz i would break 10,000 with the same cpu the 6850k needs atleast another 100mhz 4.6 ghz and it would do it it scored 98 something

I was telling him about matching CPU's not the 6 core i use

specialkone said:

That's what I thought. Tommy's CPU scores are better even at 4.7 given his 6 cores. Look at the Guru3D run with the Zotac and an I7 5960X (8 cores). The I7 5960X is "only" overclocked to 4.3 but it's getting an amazing 9396 CPU score.

Note that even the Guru3D OC graphic score, at 10806 isn't as high as Worf's. But I'm having a hard time understanding how Tommy's fast 6 core CPU at 4.7 or Guru3d's 8 cores at 4.3 (both beating Worf's CPU score of course with more cores) would be holding back their Time Spy graphic scores.

That's why I mentioned to Worf at 10.5 ish graphic scores he would have to add CPU cores to achieve overall 10K Time Spy scores as he would need 8.4 on the CPU score to achieve that. I'm no expert on ocing, but instead what Worf seems to be doing is having Nessie at 11K+ graphic scores drag his CPU along, even though it's OCed to 5.0

Attachment 134007

You guys are confused if i could get this 6850k to 4.7 Ghz i would be in Hog Heaven

I was telling WORF if i could get my 6700k up to 5 Ghz i would break 10,000

As for the 6850k i would need to lock it in at 4.6 Ghz and it might hit 10k

solarstarshines said:

You guys are confused if i could get this 6850k to 4.7 Ghz i would be in Hog Heaven

I was telling WORF if i could get my 6700k up to 5 Ghz i would break 10,000

As for the 6850k i would need to lock it in at 4.6 Ghz and it might hit 10k

Oh ya, sorry. You just have too many systems to keep track of

specialkone said:

Oh ya, sorry. You just have too many systems to keep track of

I hear you it's not like me to have this many builds at one time

I usually have one or two builds but with the price drops and the new tech i end up with three outstanding builds

I have four altogether i need to get rid of it the FX8320 with a GTX 970 included and 700 watt PSU

it's not a modular

just needs a ssd and windows + a home i want $500