Passmark Performance Test Benchmark

CountMike said:

What makes KS faster than K ?

For starters, while the original Core i9-9900K topped out at a maximum boost clock of 4.6GHz on all cores, the Core i9-9900KS bumps things up to a solid 5GHz, from a base clock of 4GHz. (The base clock is rated at just 3.6GHz in the straight Core i9-9900K.)

Plus that last score I just posted about an hour ago.....that is not my highest score. Have 5 more all higher than the one I just posted. LoL

OldMike65 said:

Plus that last score I just posted about an hour ago.....that is not my highest score. Have 5 more all higher than the one I just posted. LoL

I was just wondering what happened to it ?
AMD is doing similar thing, last batches of Ryzen have over 100MHz better than first batch (like mine) and some will get XT version with 200 -300MHz higher boost frequency for same price.
https://www.amd.com/en/products/cpu/amd-ryzen-7-3800xt

CountMike said:

I was just wondering what happened to it ?
AMD is doing similar thing, last batches of Ryzen have over 100MHz better than first batch (like mine) and some will get XT version with 200 -300MHz higher boost frequency for same price.
https://www.amd.com/en/products/cpu/amd-ryzen-7-3800xt

I just have not seen one chip by AMD that has beat any of my scores on here ....yet Mike.
I'll be upgrading my video card in Sept .....to the Nvidia RTX 3080Ti if its out by then... Keeping the same 9900ks chip I got now.

If you look at my spec's ...on my 2nd rig, I have the 9900k on there...

ThrashZone said:

HI,
You'd have to look at cinebench r20... scores to tell what chips do not this test.

Told ya once Mike....I don't give a crap about cinebench or its scores....

We got a lot of Mikes in here tonight...LoL

Its a Mike fest