Passmark Performance Test Benchmark


  1. Posts : 123,475
    Windows 11 Pro (x64) 21H2 Build 22000.675
       #651

    Cliff S said:
    Another update:
    V9.0 Build 1018 - 6th/September/2017
    Fixed a bug that was preventing the available compute units for video cards being retrieved which meant not being able to correctly name some models (eg Vega56/64)
    Darn it, just updated it yesterday too, LoL Thanks for the heads up Cliff. :)
      My Computers


  2. Posts : 19,209
    W11+W11 Developer Insider + Linux
       #652

    Wonder if September will have 32 days too ?
      My Computers


  3. Posts : 26,345
    Win11 Pro, Win10 Pro N, Win10 Home, Windows 8.1 Pro, Ubuntu
       #653

    CountMike said:
    Wonder if September will have 32 days too ?
      My Computers


  4. Posts : 19,209
    W11+W11 Developer Insider + Linux
       #654

    Few tweaks here and there and:

    Passmark Performance Test Benchmark-ryzen-ptest-9aw8a-jpg.jpg
    That stupid Rx 460, any OC and it actually lowers the score so it's left at default except for power +50%. No special OS tweaks, just my everyday setup.
    I would love to try it with Nessie !!!
    Crazy thing, look at CPU score in W7.

    Passmark Performance Test Benchmark-image.png
    Last edited by CountMike; 13 Sep 2017 at 09:52.
      My Computers


  5. Posts : 950
    Windows 10 Pro
    Thread Starter
       #655

    My score. Everything at stock. Better than I expected considering the age and spec of the old gal. I hope to upgrade it one day.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Passmark Performance Test Benchmark-passmark.png  
      My Computers


  6. Posts : 16,065
    Windows 11 Pro X64
       #656

    Board updated, Hello Paul



    Last edited by Dude; 10 Feb 2018 at 17:21.
      My Computers


  7. Posts : 12,726
    Windows 11 Pro
       #657

    Nice score Paul. Nat as bad as you thought.
      My Computer


  8. Posts : 19,209
    W11+W11 Developer Insider + Linux
       #658

    Dude said:
    Board updated, Hello Paul



    I don't see the updates ???
    Last edited by essenbe; 10 Feb 2018 at 17:22.
      My Computers


  9. Posts : 2,487
    Windows 10 Home, 64-bit
       #659

    Completely stock Intel 6600K; 8 GB DDR4 2666 RAM; integrated graphics; no video card; SSD and 2 HDDs. Components 18 months old other than the 2 HDDs, which date back to 2011.

    I don't think I've ever run this benchmark before. As it was running, I got an onscreen message saying I was being penalized some percentage in a graphics test because I did not use some very high screen resolution. I'm on 1600 x 900.

    Are those graphics scores and percentiles about as expected considering I use just Intel integrated?
      My Computer


  10. Posts : 950
    Windows 10 Pro
    Thread Starter
       #660

    Dude said:
    Board updated, Hello Paul



    Hey Doug, thanks. Hope you are doing good.

    essenbe said:
    Nice score Paul. Nat as bad as you thought.
    Thanks Steve, I am pretty sure I used to score around 7000 with my old rig so it's a bit of a kick in the balls but still better than what I expected for this rig lol.

    CountMike said:
    I don't see the updates ???
    He might have missed your score due to the shock of me posting a score for the first time in ages bud lol. Am sure he will update when he sees it.
    Last edited by essenbe; 10 Feb 2018 at 17:24.
      My Computers


 

  Related Discussions
Our Sites
Site Links
About Us
Windows 10 Forums is an independent web site and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by Microsoft Corporation. "Windows 10" and related materials are trademarks of Microsoft Corp.

Designer Media Ltd
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26.
Find Us




Windows 10 Forums