New
#11
Although MR can ignore errors if you set it to do so, in the end, I would only use this option to get as much data backed up as possible. The discussion here assumes the drive is read ok but not written to image ok. In the end, my experience tells me from literally hundreds of backups is that MR fails so rarely, wasting time on verifying image is pointless.
As I said, verification is really a hangover from DVD backup days when write could be more flakey.
Can anybody even remember a verification failing?
Hi there
verification is one thing -- can't say I've had it fail, but testing every so often a restore is another matter -- I've had - not often but certainly more than once where restore has failed for various reasons.
I randomly check a restore about once a month, and usually have more than one backup --i.e backup to 2 different disks -- chances of 2 HDD's failing at the same time are insignificant.
Cheers
jimbo
I have mine set to Auto Verify when making an image.
I also will do a verify before I do a restore.
Jim
The only issue I ever had with Macrium Reflect was when it would not restore any backup image. I keep several and never verify.
The problem was MBR virus. The solution was to boot into AOMEI PE and wipe windows partition. Only then could Macrium restore a backup image.
Yeah - my point really was (these days) verification fails so rarely that it means it is barely needed any more.
Today, I burnt a dvd of a video and it took three attempts to write - as dvds were the cheapest form of mass media a few years back, then verification was essential (still essential if you still use dvds - even then I would backup to an hdd first, and use reliable burning software).
Frankly (imo) verification really is not needed on modern hard drives.
Of course, if doing a verification gives a user "comfort factor", then fine.