New
#21
Hmm, could that GB difference be that you use G-Skill and I Kingston... seems a lot? Any OC?
I run at 2400, mine should be faster...or
Just look at the 3 readings:
My i7-Brix ddr3-798 ( 1596)
30,916, 20,688 21,426
then my AMD ddr3-1070( 2140)
14240, 12,015, 8092
so far the weaker memory kills the AMD with 2133 mem.
looking at yours
11,378, 11,294, 5680
ddr3-802(1604)
So the issue I guess is why less mem speed on AMD?
Roe5685
Two conclusions. I should return the faster on paper Kingston. Score no better than the old slower memory ( GSkill ).
Also look at my i7 brix results for slower yet again memory on paper. it achieves twice the AMD score.
Now why is that? Is it a known fact AMD cpus do a lousy job on the memory?
OR do I have setting wrong? Can anyone on an AMD cpu fx-8350 or better get score up to 30,000 like the i7 brix?
Roe5685.
Probably not because it's dual channel, but rather because it's DDR (double data rate, 2 transfers per clock tick.). Quad channel memory doesn't report 4X the clock frequency.
I believe that DDR4 and DDR3 have about the same performance at the same clocks. DDR4 uses a lower voltage, and is scalable to higher clock frequencies.
Just out of curiosity, I looked up:
PassMark Software - Memory Write Performance with AMD CPUs Benchmark Charts
PassMark Software - Memory Write Performance with Intel CPUs Benchmark Charts
I don't pretend to understand why, but these show much higher memory write speeds for Intel CPUs than for AMD. It's similar for uncached reads.
Weird. I haven't stayed current with AMD CPUs since my last system with one of their processors, in the Socket 939 days.
thanks for looking at passmark. It confirms the AMD lower than the test Intel.
But now why are the two AMD's the same even though one is higher speed than the other?